Brand Stories
Prediction of birthweight with early and mid-pregnancy antenatal markers utilising machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence
Lees, C. C. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 56, 298–312 (2020).
Martin. Health—United Nations Sustainable Development. United Nations Sustainable Development https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/#tab-3f22056b0e91266e8b2 (2023).
Krasevec, J. et al. Study protocol for UNICEF and WHO estimates of global, regional, and national low birthweight prevalence for 2000 to 2020. Gates Open Res. 6, 80 (2022).
Blencowe, H. et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 7, e849–e860 (2019).
Jia, C. H. et al. Short term outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants from a multicenter cohort study in Guangdong of China. Sci. Rep. 12, 11119 (2022).
Low birth weight. https://www.who.int/data/nutrition/nlis/info/low-birth-weight.
Okwaraji, Y. B. et al. National, regional, and global estimates of low birthweight in 2020, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet 403, 1071–1080 (2024).
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2007. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume I. Mumbai: IIPS.
Singh, D. et al. Prevalence and correlates of low birth weight in India: findings from National Family Health Survey 5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 1–10 (2023).
Sabbaghchi, M., Jalali, R. & Mohammadi, M. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of low birth weight infants in Iran. J. Pregnancy 2020, 1–7 (2020).
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Improving Birth Outcomes. In Improving Birth Outcomes: Meeting the Challenge in the Developing World (eds. Bale, J. R., Stoll, B. J., Lucas, A. O.) (National Academies Press, 2003). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222095/.
Derakhshi, B., Esmailnasab, N., Ghaderi, E. & Hemmatpour, S. Risk factor of preterm labor in the west of Iran: a case-control study. DOAJ 43, 499–506 (2014).
Moradi, G., Zokaeii, M., Goodarzi, E. & Khazaei, Z. Maternal risk factors for low birth weight infants: a nested case-control study of rural areas in Kurdistan (western of Iran). J. Prev. Med. Hyg. (2021).
Katz, J. et al. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis. Lancet 382, 417–425 (2013).
Knop, M. R. et al. Birth weight and risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension in adults: a meta-analysis of 7,646,267 participants from 135 studies. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 7, e008870 (2018).
Wu, M. et al. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasonic examination. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8, 540–545 (2015).
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. Artificial intelligence (AI): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 57, 101994 (2021).
Alanazi, A. Using machine learning for healthcare challenges and opportunities. Inform. Med. Unlocked 30, 100924 (2022).
Reddy, S. Explainability and artificial intelligence in medicine. Lancet Digit. Health 4, e214–e215 (2022).
Reza, T. B. & Salma, N. Prediction and feature selection of low birth weight using machine learning algorithms. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 43, 1–10 (2024).
Ranjbar, A. et al. Machine learning-based approach for predicting low birth weight. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 1–9 (2023).
de Morais, F. L. et al. Utilization of tree-based machine learning models for predicting low birth weight cases. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 25, 207 (2025).
Naimi, A. I., Platt, R. W. & Larkin, J. C. Machine learning for fetal growth prediction. Epidemiology 29, 290 (2018).
Tao, J., Yuan, Z., Sun, L., Yu, K. & Zhang, Z. Fetal birthweight prediction with measured data by a temporal machine learning method. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 21, 1–10 (2021).
Rubaiya, N., Mansur, M., Alam, M. M. & Rayhan, M. I. Unraveling birth weight determinants: integrating machine learning, spatial analysis, and district-level mapping. Heliyon 10, e27341 (2024).
Sadeghi, Z. et al. A review of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare. Comput. Electr. Eng. 118, 109370 (2024).
Gill, S. V., May-Benson, T. A., Teasdale, A. & Munsell, E. G. Birth and developmental correlates of birth weight in a sample of children with potential sensory processing disorder. BMC Pediatr. 13, 1–9 (2013).
Tarín, J. J., García-Pérez, M. A. & Cano, A. Potential risks to offspring of intrauterine exposure to maternal age-related obstetric complications. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 29, 1468–1475 (2016).
Wang, S. et al. Changing trends of birth weight with maternal age: a cross-sectional study in Xi’an city of Northwestern China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 1–7 (2020).
Softa, S. M. et al. The association of maternal height with mode of delivery and fetal birth weight at King Abdulaziz University Hosc, Jeddah,. Saudi Arabia. Cureus 14, e27493 (2022).
Rochow, N. et al. Maternal body height is a stronger predictor of birth weight than ethnicity: analysis of birth weight percentile charts. J. Perinat. Med. 47, 22–29 (2018).
Spada, E., Chiossi, G., Coscia, A., Monari, F. & Facchinetti, F. Effect of maternal age, height, BMI and ethnicity on birth weight: an Italian multicenter study. J. Perinat. Med. 46, 1016–1021 (2017).
Ludwig, D. S. & Currie, J. The association between pregnancy weight gain and birthweight: a within-family comparison. Lancet 376, 984–990 (2010).
Hussey, M. R. et al. Associations of placental lncRNA expression with maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and infant birthweight in two birth cohorts. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 16, 1–10 (2025).
Garces, A. et al. Association of parity with birthweight and neonatal death in five sites: The Global Network’s Maternal Newborn Health Registry study. Reprod. Health 17, 1–8 (2020).
Shah, P. S. Parity and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 89, 862–875 (2010).
Wang, Y. A. et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000. Fertil. Steril. 83, 1650–1658 (2005).
Zhong, X. et al. Effect of parental physiological conditions and assisted reproductive technologies on the pregnancy and birth outcomes in infertile patients. Oncotarget 8, 18409–18416 (2016).
Rahmati, S., Azami, M., Badfar, G., Parizad, N. & Sayehmiri, K. The relationship between maternal anemia during pregnancy with preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 33, 2679–2689 (2018).
Sherwani, S. I., Khan, H. A., Ekhzaimy, A., Masood, A. & Sakharkar, M. K. Significance of HbA1C test in diagnosis and prognosis of diabetic patients. Biomark. Insights 11, BMI.S38440 (2016).
Gabbe, S. Management of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 102, 857–868 (2003).
Li, J. et al. Maternal TSH levels at first trimester and subsequent spontaneous miscarriage: a nested case–control study. Endocr. Connect. 8, 1288–1293 (2019).
Nishioka, E. et al. Relationship between maternal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) elevation during pregnancy and low birth weight: A longitudinal study of apparently healthy urban Japanese women at very low risk. Early Hum. Dev. 91, 181–185 (2015).
Bilardo, C. M. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11–14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 61, 127–143 (2023).
Kalousová, M., Muravská, A. & Zima, T. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and preeclampsia. Adv. Clin. Chem. 63, 169–209 (2014).
Shiefa, S., Amargandhi, M., Bhupendra, J., Moulali, S. & Kristine, T. First trimester maternal serum screening using biochemical markers PAPP-A and free Β-HCG for Down syndrome, Patau syndrome and Edward syndrome. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 28, 3–12 (2012).
Salomon, L. J. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 59, 840–856 (2022).
Ogonowski, J. & Miazgowski, T. Intergenerational transmission of macrosomia in women with gestational diabetes and normal glucose tolerance. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 195, 113–116 (2015).
Yang, Y. et al. The association of gestational diabetes mellitus with fetal birth weight. J. Diabetes Complications 32, 635–642 (2018).
Ardissino, M. et al. Maternal hypertension increases risk of preeclampsia and low fetal birthweight: Genetic evidence from a Mendelian randomization study. Hypertension 79, 588–598 (2022).
Cutland, C. L. et al. Low birth weight: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data. Vaccine 35, 6492–6500 (2017).
Aziz, F., Khan, M. F. & Moiz, A. Gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia as the risk factors of preeclampsia. Sci. Rep. 14, 1–11 (2024).
Celik, N. Welch’s ANOVA: Heteroskedastic skew-t error terms. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 51, 3065–3076 (2022).
Mujahid, M. et al. Data oversampling and imbalanced datasets: an investigation of performance for machine learning and feature engineering. J Big Data 11, 87 (2024).
Cerda, P., Varoquaux, G. & Kégl, B. Similarity encoding for learning with dirty categorical variables. Mach. Learn. 107, 1477–1494 (2018).
Alkhawaldeh, I. M., Albalkhi, I. & Naswhan, A. J. Challenges and limitations of synthetic minority oversampling techniques in machine learning. World J. Methodol. 13, 373–378 (2023).
Abedin, M. Z., Guotai, C., Hajek, P. & Zhang, T. Combining weighted SMOTE with ensemble learning for the class-imbalanced prediction of small business credit risk. Complex Intell. Syst. 9, 3559–3579 (2022).
Kraskov, A., Stögbauer, H. & Grassberger, P. Estimating mutual information. Phys. Rev. E 69, 066138 (2004).
Shipe, M. E., Deppen, S. A., Farjah, F. & Grogan, E. L. Developing prediction models for clinical use using logistic regression: an overview. J. Thorac. Dis. 11, S574–S584 (2019).
Montomoli, J. et al. Machine learning using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm predicts 5-day delta of SOFA score at ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. J. Intensive Med. 1, 110–116 (2021).
Jabbar, M. A., Deekshatulu, B. L. & Chandra, P. Classification of heart disease using K-nearest neighbor and genetic algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.02061 (2015).
Zheng, J. et al. Clinical data based XGBoost algorithm for infection risk prediction of patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a 10-year (2012–2021) multicenter retrospective case-control study. BMC Gastroenterol. 23, 1–13 (2023).
Loef, B. et al. Using random forest to identify longitudinal predictors of health in a 30-year cohort study. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–12 (2022).
Wallace, M. L. et al. Use and misuse of random forest variable importance metrics in medicine: demonstrations through incident stroke prediction. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 23, 1–12 (2023).
Singh, D. & Singh, B. Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. Appl. Soft Comput. 97, 105524 (2019).
Kaliappan, J. et al. Impact of cross-validation on machine learning models for early detection of intrauterine fetal demise. Diagnostics (Basel) 13, 1692 (2023).
Elgeldawi, E., Sayed, A., Galal, A. R. & Zaki, A. M. Hyperparameter tuning for machine learning algorithms used for Arabic sentiment analysis. Informatics 8, 79 (2021).
Shekar, B. H. & Dagnew, G. Grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and classification of microarray cancer data. In Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Paradigms (ICACCP) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCP.2019.8882943
Chadaga, K. et al. Explainable artificial intelligence approaches for COVID-19 prognosis prediction using clinical markers. Sci. Rep. 14, 1–14 (2024).
Tougui, I., Jilbab, A. & Mhamdi, J. E. Impact of the choice of cross-validation techniques on the results of machine learning-based diagnostic applications. Healthc. Inform. Res. 27, 189–199 (2021).
Rodríguez-Pérez, R. & Bajorath, J. Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 34, 1013–1026 (2020).
Lundberg, S. M. et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 56–67 (2020).
Abdullakutty, F. et al. Histopathology in focus: a review on explainable multi-modal approaches for breast cancer diagnosis. Front. Med. 11, 1450103 (2024).
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Pratap Singh, R., Suman, R. & Rab, S. Significance of machine learning in healthcare: Features, pillars and applications. Int. J. Intell. Netw. 3, 58–73 (2022).
Arain, Z., Iliodromiti, S., Slabaugh, G., David, A. L. & Chowdhury, T. T. Machine learning and disease prediction in obstetrics. Curr. Res. Physiol. 6, 100099 (2023).
Alzubaidi, M. et al. Ensemble transfer learning for fetal head analysis: From segmentation to gestational age and weight prediction. Diagnostics 12, 2229 (2022).
Hughes, M. M., Black, R. E. & Katz, J. 2500-g low birth weight cutoff: history and implications for future research and policy. Matern. Child Health J. 21, 283 (2016).
Zeegers, B. et al. Birthweight charts customised for maternal height optimises the classification of small and large-for-gestational age newborns. Acta Paediatr. https://doi.org/10.1111/APA.17332 (2024).
Teoh, Z.H., Mariapun, J., Ko, V.S.Y., Dominic, N.A., Jeganathan, R., Karalasingam, S.D. & Thirunavuk Arasoo, V.J. Maternal height, and ethnicity and birth weight: A retrospective cohort study of uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries in Malaysia. Birth. 51, 620–628 (2024).
Sutan, R., Mohtar, M., Mahat, A. N. & Tamil, A. M. Determinant of low birth weight infants: a matched case control study. Open J. Prev. Med. 4, 91–99 (2014).
To, W. W. K., Cheung, W. & Kwok, J. S. Y. Paternal height and weight as determinants of birth weight in a Chinese population. Am. J. Perinatol. 15, 545–548 (1998).
Pölzlberger, E., Hartmann, B., Hafner, E., Stümpflein, I. & Kirchengast, S. Maternal height and pre-pregnancy weight status are associated with fetal growth patterns and newborn size. J. Biosoc. Sci. 49, 392–407 (2017).
Ay, L. et al. Maternal anthropometrics are associated with fetal size in different periods of pregnancy and at birth: the Generation R Study. BJOG 116, 953–963 (2009).
Mathai, M. et al. Ethnicity and fetal growth in Fiji. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 44, 318–321 (2004).
Figueras, F. et al. Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 136, 20–24 (2008).
Britto, R. P. D. A. et al. Influence of maternal height and weight on low birth weight: a cross-sectional study in poor communities of northeastern Brazil. PLoS ONE 8, e000000 (2013).
Mongelli, M., Figueras, F., Francis, A. & Gardosi, J. A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian population. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 47, 128–131 (2007).
McCowan, L., Stewart, A. W., Francis, A. & Gardosi, J. A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for a New Zealand population. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 44, 428–431 (2004).
Zhang, G. et al. Assessing the causal relationship of maternal height on birth size and gestational age at birth: a Mendelian randomization analysis. PLoS Med. 12, e100000 (2015).
Kaur, S. et al. Risk factors for low birth weight among rural and urban Malaysian women. BMC Public Health 19, 539 (2019).
Inoue, S. et al. Association between short maternal height and low birth weight: a hospital-based study in Japan. J. Korean Med. Sci. 31, 353–359 (2016).
Retnakaran, R. et al. Association of timing of weight gain in pregnancy with infant birth weight. JAMA Pediatr. 172, 136–142 (2018).
Mohapatra, I., Harshini, N., Samantaray, S. R. & Naik, G. Association between early pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain in relation to neonatal birth weight. Cureus 14, e23000 (2022).
Arora, P. & Tamber Aeri, B. Gestational weight gain among healthy pregnant women from Asia in comparison with Institute of Medicine (IOM) Guidelines-2009: a systematic review. J. Pregnancy 2019, 3849596 (2019).
Hackmon, R. et al. Do early fetal measurements and nuchal translucency correlate with term birth weight?. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 39, 750–756 (2017).
Jackson, M. & Rose, N. C. Diagnosis and management of fetal nuchal translucency. Semin. Roentgenol. 33, 333–338 (1998).
Kalem, Z., Kaya, A. E., Bakırarar, B. & Kalem, M. N. Fetal nuchal translucency: is there an association with birthweight and neonatal wellbeing?. Turk. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 16, 35–40 (2019).
Napolitano, R. et al. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown–rump length: a systematic review of charts. BJOG 121, 556–565 (2014).
Fries, N. et al. The impact of optimal dating on the assessment of fetal growth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 1–8 (2021).
Salomon, L. J. Early fetal growth: concepts and pitfalls. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 35, 385–389 (2010).
Papageorghiou, A. T. et al. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown–rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 44, 641 (2014).
Kozuki, N. et al. The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 13(Suppl 3), S2 (2013).
Hinkle, S. N. et al. The association between parity and birthweight in a longitudinal consecutive pregnancy cohort. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 28, 106 (2013).
Krulewitch, C. J., Herman, A. A., Yu, K. F. & Johnson, Y. R. Does changing paternity contribute to the risk of intrauterine growth retardation?. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 11, 41–47 (1997).
Luo, Z. C. et al. The effects and mechanisms of primiparity on the risk of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 21, 36–45 (2007).
Sørnes, T. & Bakke, T. Uterine size, parity and umbilical cord length. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 68, 439–441 (1989).
Clapp, J. F. & Capeless, E. Cardiovascular function before, during, and after the first and subsequent pregnancies. Am. J. Cardiol. 80, 1469–1473 (1997).
Dasa, T. T., Okunlola, M. A. & Dessie, Y. Effect of grand multiparity on the adverse birth outcome: a hospital-based prospective cohort study in Sidama Region, Ethiopia. Int. J. Womens Health 14, 363 (2022).
Lin, L., Lu, C., Chen, W., Li, C. & Guo, V. Y. Parity and the risks of adverse birth outcomes: a retrospective study among Chinese. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 1–11 (2021).
Baer, R. J., Lyell, D. J., Norton, M. E., Currier, R. J. & Jelliffe-Pawlowski, L. L. First trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and birth weight. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 198, 1–6 (2016).
Turrado Sánchez, E. M., De Miguel Sánchez, V. & Macía Cortiñas, M. Correlation between PAPP-A levels determined during the first trimester and birth weight at full-term. Reprod. Sci. 30, 3235 (2023).
Zhao, D. et al. Association between maternal blood glucose levels during pregnancy and birth outcomes: a birth cohort study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 2102 (2023).
Everett, T. R. & Lees, C. C. Beyond the placental bed: placental and systemic determinants of the uterine artery Doppler waveform. Placenta 33, 893–901 (2012).
Liu, Y. et al. Impact of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia on low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age infants in China: a large prospective cohort study. J. Clin. Hypertens. 23, 835 (2021).
Gibbs, C. M., Wendt, A., Peters, S. & Hogue, C. J. The impact of early age at first childbirth on maternal and infant health. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 26, 259–284 (2012).
Markovitz, B. P., Cook, R., Flick, L. H. & Leet, T. L. Socioeconomic factors and adolescent pregnancy outcomes: distinctions between neonatal and post-neonatal deaths?. BMC Public Health 5, 279 (2005).
Sharma, V. et al. Young maternal age and the risk of neonatal mortality in rural Nepal. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 162, 828–835 (2008).
Alam, N. Teenage motherhood and infant mortality in Bangladesh: maternal age-dependent effect of parity one. J. Biosoc. Sci. 32, 229–236 (2000).
Restrepo-Méndez, M. C. et al. Childbearing during adolescence and offspring mortality: findings from three population-based cohorts in southern Brazil. BMC Public Health 11, 781 (2011).
Paranjothy, S., Broughton, H., Adappa, R. & Fone, D. Teenage pregnancy: who suffers?. Arch. Dis. Child. 94, 239–245 (2009).
Lawlor, D. A., Mortensen, L. & Andersen, A. M. N. Mechanisms underlying the associations of maternal age with adverse perinatal outcomes: a sibling study of 264,695 Danish women and their firstborn offspring. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40, 1205–1214 (2011).
Fall, C. H. D. et al. Association between maternal age at childbirth and child and adult outcomes in the offspring: a prospective study in five low-income and middle-income countries (COHORTS collaboration). Lancet Glob. Health 3, e366–e377 (2015).
Alves, C., Jenkins, S. M. & Rapp, A. Early pregnancy loss (spontaneous abortion) (StatPearls, 2023).
Jackson, T. & Watkins, E. Early pregnancy loss. J. Am. Acad. Physician Assist. 34, 22–27 (2021).
Nicolaides, K. H. A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks’ assessment. Prenat. Diagn. 31, 3–6 (2011).
Bekele, W. T. Machine learning algorithms for predicting low birth weight in Ethiopia. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 22, 1–16 (2022).
Arayeshgari, M., Najafi-Ghobadi, S., Tarhsaz, H., Parami, S. & Tapak, L. Machine learning-based classifiers for the prediction of low birth weight. Healthc. Inform. Res. 29, 54 (2023).
Pollob, S. M. A. I., Abedin, M. M., Islam, M. T., Islam, M. M. & Maniruzzaman, M. Predicting risks of low birth weight in Bangladesh with machine learning. PLoS ONE 17, e000000 (2022).
Khan, W. et al. Infant birth weight estimation and low birth weight classification in United Arab Emirates using machine learning algorithms. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–12 (2022).
Hussain, Z. & Borah, M. D. Birth weight prediction of newborn baby with application of machine learning techniques on features of mother. J. Stat. Manag. Syst. 23, 1079–1091 (2020).
Alabbad, D. A. et al. Birthweight range prediction and classification: a machine learning-based sustainable approach. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 6, 770–788 (2024).
Dola, S. S. & Valderrama, C. E. Exploring parental factors influencing low birth weight on the 2022 CDC natality dataset. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 24, 367 (2024).
Liu, Q. et al. Machine learning approaches for predicting fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy: a retrospective study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 25, 1–10 (2025).
Brand Stories
Martyr “Majid Tajan -Jari”: The Man Who Reached the Heart of the World’s Artificial Intelligence
TEHRAN- Martyr Majid Tajan Jar—a scientific genius who journeyed from the courtyard of his home in the village of Tajan Jar in Mazandaran Province to the heart of the world’s AI, now immortalized beside the word martyr.
Dr. Majid Tajan-Jari was a child who didn’t just take apart a broken radio but pieced its scattered fragments together like a puzzle, crafting a future with his small hands—a future that still echoes in the quiet of his childhood home.
It was as if an inner voice whispered to him: “The future begins right here.” This is the story told by a mother who witnessed every moment of it… and now narrates the silence of a home that her son, with his brilliance and his blood, gave meaning to.
A brilliance that seemed to have come from the future…
Some people are born not just for their own time, but for the times to come. From childhood, Dr. Majid Tajan-Jari showed signs of this timelessness in his demeanor—a sharp, creative mind that quickly blurred the line between play and science.
zobeideh Khaleghi, the martyr’s mother, recalls: “I remember one day when we went to the store together. Video players had just arrived. Majid was about ten or eleven. He took an old radio from his aunt, dismantled it, understood its components, and rebuilt it from scratch. We just watched, but it was as if he had a blueprint in his mind.”
Their simple courtyard became his laboratory—where he worked with electrical circuits and soldering. “One day, he asked me, ‘Mom, I don’t have a workshop—can I work here?’ I told him, ‘This house is yours. Do whatever you want.’”
Majid’s father, a retired employee, spoke of their financial struggles: “We had little, but Majid never gave up. He taught himself, built, and created.” At eighteen, he built a robot that didn’t just move—it thought.
Zobeideh continues: “We didn’t understand what he was making, but we knew it was something from the future.” Her voice is quiet, choked with emotion: “The pain of losing a child who was building the future is unbearable. The house feels smaller without him, and its silence is louder than ever.”
Yet Majid was not only unmatched in scientific brilliance—his ethics transcended ordinary boundaries. “He was kind to everyone; his respect and politeness were legendary,” his mother says. “Sometimes I thought his ‘grade’ in ethics was infinite.”
Majid’s move to Tehran was quiet and unassuming. “For fourteen years, he worked in silence,” his mother recalls. “I didn’t fully grasp what he was doing, but I felt he was fighting for something greater than himself.”
The scent of his shirt still lingers in the house…
Her voice trembles—not from breaking, but from standing firm, from honoring that pain. Softly, she says: “When I saw his body, it was as if the world stopped. I just looked at him… with that same smile he always had in my memory. I told myself, ‘Be calm—he wasn’t meant to stay. They didn’t bury him in the earth; they took him to the sky.’”
“He always said, ‘Kiss my throat, Mom…’” A brief silence follows. The mother looks down, then speaks a heavy truth: “Every time I visited his home, he’d say, ‘Mom, kiss my throat…’ Now I understand. I’m ashamed that the last time, I couldn’t kiss his throat.”
Our hearts are broken, but we have not collapsed
Amid this crushing grief, a voice rises from the depths of faith—not of mourning, but of resilience: “My sister calls every day and asks, ‘Zobeideh, I’m just his aunt, and I’m burning with grief—how are you still breathing?’ And I tell her, ‘Patience is the only thing Majid planted in my heart. He left, but he left his patience behind for me.’”
“His memory has lit up our lives.”
“We mothers live with our skin and bones—we touch pain. But every night, I tell myself, ‘Majid, my soul, though they took your body from me, your name, your memory, your voice are still with me. Sometimes, I still hear the door… as if you’re coming home, turning the key, saying, ‘Mom, I hope you’re not tired.’”
Ali Tajan-Jari, the martyr’s father, a quiet man with a gaze heavy with years of experience, sits on the couch, flipping through old photographs.
In a simple home, he had a global mind
His father, with a faint smile, glances toward the courtyard. A quiet pride lingers in his eyes: “That simple home, that humble courtyard, became the birthplace of boundless dreams.”
“From that small room, he connected with the world. He said, ‘I will stay in Iran, but my scientific voice must be heard beyond borders.’ And so it was. I often heard that when asked where his students were, he’d smile and say, ‘Everywhere… Spain, England, Canada, Turkey…’”
He built bridges from failure
A brief silence lingers between the father’s words before he continues: “In one of our talks, he said, ‘I’ve failed many, many times… but I built a home—a scientific family. All my chances were there.’ That group was called ‘AIO Learn’—young people who rose from the ground and reached the summit.”
The father places a hand on his chest, as if something deep within him speaks: “We didn’t know Majid was teaching. Not out of secrecy, but because, amid building robots and AI projects, that side of him was less visible.”
“One day, we heard his students had surpassed 500,000. Majid was a teacher without borders—with a virtual blackboard, yet magnificent. And all of it began in a room that didn’t even have an extra chair. Just love, a laptop, and a light of passion.”
“He always said, ‘Science must have attraction—not fear, not force… only motivation and the desire to know.’”
A Quran that still carries his presence…
Moments later, the father grows quieter. His eyes settle on a small Quran on the table—the one that had accompanied his son for years. Slowly, he takes out his glasses, places them on, and silently recites a verse.
His voice is soft, but the words are clear and firm. He closes the Quran, running his hand over its cover—as if still feeling the warmth of his son’s hands.
In the silence of the house, only the sound of his breathing can be heard. His gaze lingers on his son’s portrait. He says nothing. But that look tells a thousand unspoken words.
The end of a story, the beginning of a path
This chapter of Majid’s life was not just a career—it was part of Iran’s scientific identity today. A young man who chose to stay instead of emigrate, to build instead of complain, and to take root instead of leave.
In a simple home, with hands on a keyboard and a heart full of conviction, he trained students who now carry his legacy across the world.
The legacy he planted in life…
Mohaddeseh Tajan-Jari, the martyr’s sister, sits composed in the frame of the image. Soft light from a half-open window falls on her face. Her voice, delicate and measured, wavers between sorrow and pride:
“Sometimes they ask, ‘What did Majid leave behind?’ He had no children, no family of his own… But I say, ‘If only they knew what a child truly is.’”
“Majid did not father a child of his blood, but he fathered one of his mind—he named it his company. He always said with certainty, ‘I built AIO Learn… this is my child.’”
She pauses briefly, then adds: “Majid wasn’t just my brother—he was my confidant. We never fought—not because we couldn’t, but because there was no need. We were friends, united in thought, concern, and heart. More than a brother, he was my teacher—one whose silence itself was a lesson.”
“When my child was born, he was genuinely happy. He’d buy toys and say, ‘He must grow up intelligent.’ He wasn’t a father, but he lived fatherhood. In action, he was a martyr—not just in title.”
Her voice grows quieter, but the meaning grows heavier: “He didn’t see martyrdom only in combat. He stayed up till dawn coding, creating ideas, building the future. He wrote projects that seemed to come from decades ahead.”
“His jihad was a jihad of thought—his battlefield was science, his weapon genius. Martyrdom was not the end of his path—it was the manifestation of a life entirely devoted.”
My brother said ‘no’ to money, ‘yes’ to his homeland
The narrative shifts—from emotion to loyalty, from offers to faith. “When a major European company made him a staggering offer, everyone thought his choice was obvious. High salary, easy immigration… I told him, ‘Majid, it’s your decision.’ He smiled and said, ‘Mahdeh, I can’t live in a country where they lie about my people day and night. Even if I have to live in a tent, I’d rather be in my homeland.’”
An ascension that was preordained
Her gaze drifts to a distant point—a moment of silence. Then, with inner conviction, she says: “Majid wasn’t born—it was as if he descended. He came to build, to teach, to inspire… and when his mission was complete, he left. Not in silence, but at his peak.”
“I always think God entrusted Majid to us for only thirty-five years. Now, his mission is over… but his voice still flows.”
We are still standing…
Today, the small room in the Tajan-Jar home is silent. The sound of soldering is gone, the monitor remains dark, the desk empty. But the ideas born in that room are more alive than ever—in the pulse of research, the veins of science, the sky of hope.
Martyr Dr. Majid Tajan-Jari is no longer among us, but his vision still shines in the eyes of his students. His thoughts live on in the code he wrote, the projects he brought to life, the dreams he refused to leave unfinished.
He is gone, but his path remains. His principles—his belief in staying, in building, in nurturing elites on his homeland’s soil—endure.
A father, with eyes full of pride, spoke of a son who, in silence, in dignity, in action, wrote a new definition of scientific jihad.
And today, we are certain: some people do not come to stay—they come to light a lamp that will illuminate the path for years to come…
Martyr Dr. Majid Tajan-Jari was not just a scientific genius—he was the embodiment of committed, scholarly, and national life. A man who could have crossed borders, shone in the world’s best institutions, but chose to remain in this soil, take root, and build a bright future.
(Source: Mehr News Agency)
In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming industries, reshaping the workforce, and redefining the rules of competition. What was once science fiction is now embedded in our everyday lives—from intelligent virtual assistants and automated customer service bots to advanced predictive analytics in healthcare and finance. As AI continues to expand its capabilities, individuals and organizations face an urgent question: How do we stay relevant in the age of AI?
The answer lies not in resisting the inevitable, but in adapting to it, embracing a mindset of lifelong learning, cultivating uniquely human skills, and strategically leveraging AI as a collaborator rather than a competitor.
—
1. Embrace Lifelong Learning
The most crucial shift in the AI era is a philosophical one: learning must never stop. In the past, a university degree could set the course for an entire career. Today, the half-life of skills—the time it takes for a skill to become half as valuable—continues to shrink, with estimates placing it at around five years or less in many tech-driven fields.
To stay relevant, individuals must continuously update their knowledge base. This doesn’t always mean going back to school. Online platforms like Coursera, edX, and LinkedIn Learning offer flexible, up-to-date courses in data science, digital marketing, cybersecurity, and AI fundamentals. Microlearning, bootcamps, and professional certifications can also offer rapid upskilling in key areas.
Staying relevant in the AI age means evolving as fast as the technology itself.
—
2. Cultivate Uniquely Human Skills
AI excels at tasks that are repetitive, data-driven, or logic-based. However, there are limits to what AI can replicate—especially when it comes to human empathy, ethics, creativity, and emotional intelligence.
Skills such as:
Critical thinking – evaluating information, making sound decisions, and solving novel problems.
Communication – articulating complex ideas clearly, listening actively, and collaborating across diverse teams.
Creativity – thinking divergently, innovating, and imagining new possibilities.
Empathy and leadership – understanding human emotions and guiding people effectively.
These are competencies that remain difficult for AI to emulate and therefore represent a core area where humans hold a lasting advantage.
Workers who can integrate both technical and soft skills—what some call “T-shaped professionals”—are particularly valuable. They have deep knowledge in one area (like AI programming or design thinking) and broad capabilities across disciplines, making them adaptable and cross-functional.
—
3. Learn to Collaborate With AI
Rather than fearing that AI will take jobs, the more productive outlook is to ask, “How can I use AI to enhance my work?”
Consider AI not as a rival, but as a tool for augmentation. For example:
A content creator can use AI to generate initial drafts or brainstorm headlines faster.
A data analyst can leverage machine learning models to uncover patterns that would take days to detect manually.
A marketer can personalize customer interactions using AI-powered recommendation engines.
Professionals who understand how to work with AI systems—inputting the right data, interpreting AI outputs, and making informed decisions—will become indispensable. This is particularly true in fields like healthcare, finance, law, and engineering, where AI can offer insights, but human oversight remains critical.
—
4. Stay Curious and Adaptable
In the age of AI, agility is the new security. Industries will change. Job descriptions will evolve. Roles will emerge that don’t even exist today. The ability to remain open, curious, and agile is far more valuable than expertise in a single tool or platform.
Cultivating a “growth mindset”—a belief that abilities and intelligence can be developed through effort and persistence—is crucial. People with growth mindsets are more likely to embrace change, learn from failures, and reinvent themselves in response to new challenges.
Being adaptable also means paying attention to trends and shifts in your industry. Subscribing to tech newsletters, attending webinars, joining professional communities, or simply staying informed can help you anticipate changes before they disrupt your work.
—
5. Ethical Awareness and Human-Centered Thinking
AI raises profound ethical questions—around bias, privacy, transparency, and accountability. As the technology becomes more powerful, ethical literacy becomes a vital skill. Understanding not just what AI can do, but what it should do, is critical.
Whether you’re a developer, policymaker, or user, approaching AI with a human-centered mindset—prioritizing fairness, inclusivity, and long-term impact—ensures that technological progress aligns with human values. Individuals who can bridge technical knowledge with ethical reasoning will play an essential role in shaping responsible AI systems.
—
Final Thoughts
Staying relevant in the age of AI is less about outpacing machines and more about deepening what makes us distinctively human. The future belongs to those who can learn continuously, think critically, act ethically, and collaborate seamlessly with intelligent systems.
Rather than fearing the rise of AI, we must see it as an opportunity—an invitation to reimagine how we work, learn, and contribute in a world where change is the only constant. As AI takes over more routine tasks, our job is to do what AI cannot: lead with heart, think with nuance, and innovate with purpose.
In the end, staying relevant is not about resisting the future—it’s about becoming ready for it.
Choosing winners in the fast-paced artificial intelligence (AI) race isn’t always easy. Small AI start-ups can flame out quickly, while large companies run the risk of failing to keep up. Many investors opt to put their money in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track indexes to spread their money across a variety of companies.
One of the most popular ETFs with a lot of exposure to AI stocks is the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ -0.14%). The fund is designed to track the performance of the Nasdaq-100 index, and investing in it is a great way to benefit from the AI race without having to handpick the winners. Here’s why.
Image source: Getty Images.
1. It has exposure to the top AI companies
The Invesco QQQ Trust‘s largest holdings are key players in the AI race and have already benefited — and will likely continue to benefit — as artificial intelligence grows. With this fund, you’ll be invested in Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, and Alphabet, as well as other tech companies making big moves in AI.
Consider that Nvidia is one of the leading AI processor companies, with an estimated 95% of the AI processor market, and that Amazon and Microsoft are the two largest cloud computing companies offering advanced AI services to their customers.
All of this means that owning some of Invesco QQQ Trust will allow you to tap into AI processors, AI cloud services, artificial intelligence software, and likely whatever new AI products and services debut over the coming years.
2. ETFs are a great investment for beginners and experts alike
Whether you’re just getting started in investing or you’ve been doing it for decades, ETFs are a great addition to any portfolio because they allow you to take some of the guesswork out of investing. Instead of poring over earnings calls and keeping tabs on how some macroeconomic news might affect the specific company you’re invested in, you can instead spread your money across many companies all at once.
Plus, with the Invesco QQQ Trust, your investment will track the combined movements of the top 100 non-financial companies on the Nasdaq, many of which are the world’s leading tech companies. As hundreds of billions of dollars are invested in AI in the coming years, this fund could continue to benefit from the strong artificial intelligence foundation that’s already been established.
3. Easy liquidity and relatively low costs
Being the fifth-largest ETF, you won’t have much of a problem buying or selling your shares of the Invesco QQQ Trust. A substantial amount of daily trading volumes and about $354 billion in assets under management mean that you’ll easily find a buyer when you’re ready to sell.
What’s more, the fund has a relatively low expense ratio of just 0.20%. If you have $1,000 in the fund, your annual expense ratio is just $2 in fees. Since it’s passively managed, the Invesco QQQ Trust charges far less than actively managed funds, which select stocks in an attempt to outperform specific indexes. Lower expense ratios help you keep more of the gains earned by the fund.
4. The Invesco QQQ Trust has been a top performer
No matter where you invest your money, there’s always a risk that your investments won’t perform well. And even if they do make significant gains when you own them, there’s no guarantee they’ll continue to do so.
But there’s something to be said for funds that historically perform well over time. Since its launch in 1999, the Invesco QQQ Trust has gained nearly 1,000% while the S&P 500 is up about 400%. Of course, that doesn’t mean it will continue growing at the same pace or even that the fund will outpace the broader market’s returns in the coming years. Still, it’s an indication the fund has, in the past, successfully benefited from large tech trends.
If you have $1,000 to spend right now and want to tap into artificial intelligence, this fund is a smart move. While there may be others with more focused exposure to AI, the Invesco QQQ Trust allows you to benefit from the largest technology companies on the Nasdaq, which could provide stability and long-term opportunity.
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week agoAmazon weighs further investment in Anthropic to deepen AI alliance
-
Brand Stories2 weeks ago
Voice AI Startup ElevenLabs Plans to Add Hubs Around the World
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
How Elon Musk’s rogue Grok chatbot became a cautionary AI tale
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
UK crime agency arrests 4 people over cyber attacks on retailers
-
Asia Travel Pulse2 weeks ago
Looking For Adventure In Asia? Here Are 7 Epic Destinations You Need To Experience At Least Once – Zee News
-
AI in Travel2 weeks ago
‘Will AI take my job?’ A trip to a Beijing fortune-telling bar to see what lies ahead | China
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
EU pushes ahead with AI code of practice
-
Mergers & Acquisitions2 weeks ago
ChatGPT — the last of the great romantics
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
Humans must remain at the heart of the AI story
-
The Travel Revolution of Our Era1 month ago
CheQin.ai Redefines Hotel Booking with Zero-Commission Model
You must be logged in to post a comment Login