It’s Friday 25 July, and I’ve just wrapped up for the week when a notification pings on my phone: “The far right have called a protest outside Highcross House in Leicester, which is housing refugees… If you know anyone who can get over, please let them know.” Our reporters raced to monitor the situation, and our photographer, Devon, arrived on scene within the hour. There were no more than a dozen right wing protesters, waving Israeli flags and opposing the hotel’s use for housing asylum seekers. It appeared to be a damp squib – nothing quite like the violent rallies in Epping that same week.
A group of anti-migrant protesters outside Highcross House. Photograph: Stand Up to Racism
Then we found out this protest was livestreamed to 57,000 people on YouTube, amplifying the reach across the country. What came next was our investigation into a new dynamic in the anti-migrant movement, termed ‘migrant hunting’ by so-called YouTube ‘auditors’. Auditing – which is nothing to do with financial accounts in this case – is the growing practice of filming and provoking police, security guards, council officers, protesters and more, in public.
The rest of this article contains language which may cause offence.
Chris Boyall: The face behind ‘England Till I Die’
Chris Boyall, pictured. Photograph: Stand Up to Racism
During the week of the demonstration, Chris Boyall, known online as ‘England Till I Die,’ livestreamed multiple times, including four times from outside the Highcross House hotel. On Monday 21 July, he instructed his 7,000 viewers to take action against hotels housing asylum seekers in Blackpool and Leicester. In another livestream, he called for violence against refugees and asylum seekers: “Massive respect as well for the people that go into these hotels… It ain’t going to be long before we have to come out of these fucking doors and fight on these streets.”
Two days later, on Wednesday 23 July, Boyall livestreamed from outside Highcross House again, holding his camera up to the window, and urging his 23,000 viewers to protest outside the hotel the following Friday. Despite his calls to action, only 12 people attended the protest, including another YouTube auditor who racked up 57,000 views during the demonstration.
Paul Dunbar: The self-described ‘citizen journalist’
Paul Dunbar, pictured. Photograph: Stand Up to Racism
Paul Dunbar, who was also at the protest, goes by ‘DP Audits’ online, and gained local attention earlier this year when a video of him being pushed to the ground by a police officer was seen by 180,000 people. Dunbar travels around the country for his YouTube channel, recording protests, police, and arguments on the street.
Dunbar arrived at the Highcross House protest and began livestreaming the demonstration. Here he engaged with police and said, “Contrary to the belief, I actually think the migrant interviews do help the left argument more than anything, cuz it humanises the migrants.” There was a lot of standing around, as Dunbar spoke to fellow YouTubers and asked passing hotel residents, “how long have you stayed here for?”
Dunbar’s social media activity reveals his far right views. In one post on X, he calls for a “British phobia law” to “punish” left wing activists and foreign nationals. His content has also been shared by far right activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson. Dunbar responded to Yaxley-Lennon’s post with “Respect for sharing Tommy 💯👊❤️.”
Be part of the story
Join our free mailing list to get local news and tips in your inbox every week.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The incident at a pro-Palestine protest
Boyall and Dunbar outside Barclays Bank on Humberstone Gate during a pro-Palestine demonstration. Video: supplied
On Saturday 26 July, Boyall and others from the Highcross House protest gatecrashed a pro-Palestine demonstration outside Barclays Bank on Humberstone Gate. During the event, Dunbar filmed a woman being arrested by police on suspicion of assault. The video, titled ‘Mother arrested for an opinion by tyrant Leicester Police,’ garnered over 84,000 views. Subsequent videos on the same topic also brought in an audience of over 20,000 each.
Following this, a Leicestershire Police spokesperson said: “Officers received an allegation of assault in Leicester city centre on Saturday afternoon (26 July). It was alleged by a man that a woman had pushed him. To carry out further enquiries and establish the full circumstances surrounding the incident, a 31-year-old woman was arrested on suspicion of assault. An allegation was then made to officers that the man had spat in the woman’s face prior to her arrest.
“Following enquiries carried out at the scene, which included the review of CCTV, the woman was later de-arrested and not taken into police custody.
“No further action is being taken against the parties involved.”
After the protest, Boyall returned to Highcross House and told two asylum seekers outside the hotel to “have some respect, you’re in our country.” He stayed for about 10 minutes before leaving.
Boyall’s connections to the far right
Boyall and Dunbar together at the Highcross House protest on Friday 25 July. Photograph: Devon Winters
His content frequently focuses on right wing marches and events. He has been seen in London, where he met and took a photo with former English Defence League (EDL) leader Kevin Carroll. It’s believed that Boyall was a member of the now largely defunct EDL, as his Facebook page features photos of him posing in pubs with EDL flags. His social media also displays similar EDL symbols, like the Knights of the Templar and St. George’s Cross. In one video, he can be heard repeatedly chanting Tommy Robinson’s name.
His comments also suggest links to people close to Robinson. In another video published prior to the Highcross House protest, Boyall says that “I can confirm that Tommy Robinson will not be attending” the demonstrations in Epping, “that’s the information I’m being given.”
The potential danger posed by migrant hunters
The SUTR counter-protest at Highcross House on Friday 25 July. Photograph: Devon Winters
The run-up to the protest on Friday 25 July brought the actions of Boyall and Dunbar to the attention of the Leicester branch of Stand Up to Racism (SUTR). On Friday evening, the group was involved in organising a counter-protest outside Highcross House. A spokesperson said: “On Saturday, there were nine protests called by the far right up and down the country that we’re aware of, these included Manchester, Islington, Edinburgh, Newcastle, Oxford, Leeds, Holy Lake, Portsmouth, and Bournemouth. Each one of these was a counter demonstration called by SUTR. In some of these, it was 50/50.
“At the moment, what we’re seeing is a crisis of politics. There’s a lot of discontent with the political mainstream, and there’s a lot of fear.
“SUTR believes that the UK is fighting for its identity. Is this going to be a country where we are proud of our multiculturalism, or is it going to be one where we let white supremacists call the shots?
“As for those people who say if you ignore these far right forces they will go away, none of these protests were called by Stand Up to Racism, they were all triggered by organised, right wing activists, whipping up fear around asylum seekers. We have to respond to this if we want to keep tolerance and humanity in this country.”
“All our protests will be peaceful. We want to invite everybody who wants to see a fair country and equality in this country, and not allow these far right racists to whip up hysteria.”
Since 2023, Highcross House has been used to house 275 refugees and asylum seekers whilst their applications to stay in the country are assessed. Many people find themselves in temporary migrant housing for various reasons. Hotels are not a perfect solution to a complicated problem, especially since government departments often lack the resources they need. It’s important to remember that many people in these temporary homes have fled dangerous situations in their home countries.
Boyall and Dunbar, and others in the anti-migrant movement in Leicester and across the UK, pose a serious concern to hotel security, staff and temporary residents. Migrant hunters like Boyall and Dunbar may put vulnerable people at risk by posting their faces on YouTube and provoking them.
Boyall did not respond to requests for comment.
Update Friday 8 August 2025:
In response to our investigation, Dunbar said:
“If you want to run Stand Up to Racism’s nonsense at the minute, in this current climate, and take backlash from your “right wing” Leicester readers, then you crack on. But I wouldn’t start calling me and people concerned far right because of listening to actual far left nonsense. But it’s up to you. I feel that article is slander as well.
“The British phobia law was clearly humour as this country seems to think it’s OK to have certain religions trying to be exempt from criticism… still beating the Tommy Robinson drum… I thanked him for sharing a post.
“And as for far right… if you and Stand Up to Racism think I’m far right then I’m sorry, but your point of view is null and void now because what a load of shite.
“Why don’t you ask Stand Up to Racism to answer some serious questions about the disproportionate amount of violence and sex crimes coming from these Afghan and Eritrean etc illegal migrants. They won’t, will they? Because they have silly narratives as well.
“I’ll tell you straight; I have two young daughters and if the crime stats are telling me there is an issue then I no longer give a shit about the left’s ‘oh but we need to help everybody’ bullshit.
“Our children and women’s safety now is top priority… that is not racist… then you get to economic. Of course, migration [is] fine, if you’re already loaded. The working class, ordinary people pick up the bill… and I’m not talking about illegal migration here. I think we have issues massively there… way too high numbers. I mean literally, where is everybody going to live? It’s not rocket science.
“I’m right, not far right. Stand Up to Racism is 100% far left. Bare [sic] that in mind.
“See my migrant interviews on my TikTok. They’ve gained me thousands of Muslim followers and people from these countries. So yes, I think my statement is correct.”
Home»TRAVEL ALERT» UK Tourism Impacted as Protests Erupt Outside Immigrant Hotels Amid Housing Controversy
Published on
August 9, 2025 |
On August 8 and 9, 2025, protests erupted outside multiple hotels across the UK that house asylum seekers, stirring controversy around the government’s immigration policies. The demonstrations, which took place in over 20 locations, raised significant concerns about the broader implications of housing asylum seekers in hotels. These protests, centered around what many have called “immigrant hotels,” are not only a challenge to the country’s immigration policies but also threaten the tourism industry, with potential impacts on local economies that rely on tourism.
The protests are particularly noteworthy as they coincide with peak tourist season, with demonstrators voicing their dissatisfaction about the government’s approach to housing migrants in temporary accommodations. As asylum seekers occupy hotels that are usually booked by travelers, local tourism providers and businesses face growing tension as protests disrupt tourism hotspots and challenge the use of hotels as temporary housing.
The Strain on Local Tourism and Communities
The increasing number of protests in tourist-heavy regions such as Dover, Birmingham, and London has drawn attention to the negative effects on local tourism. These areas, which are popular for both domestic and international visitors, are experiencing disruptions. Local businesses, including hotels, restaurants, and shops, have reported a decline in foot traffic and bookings due to the protests. As tensions rise, international tourists might reconsider their travel plans, wary of potential unrest and the heightened political atmosphere surrounding immigration.
In areas like Dover, where protests have frequently occurred, local tourism is struggling. With many hotels housing asylum seekers, there’s growing concern among small businesses that rely on seasonal tourists. Protestors argue that the influx of asylum seekers has placed a burden on the local economy, which is exacerbated by the political rhetoric surrounding migration. For these businesses, the uncertainty of the situation is affecting their ability to plan for a stable future, especially as the peak summer season approaches.
Government’s Response and Its Impact on Tourism
The UK Home Office has responded to the protests by reducing the number of hotels being used to house asylum seekers. From over 400 hotels in the summer of 2023, this number has now dropped to fewer than 210. This reduction is part of the government’s effort to manage the immigration crisis while attempting to limit its impact on tourism.
Further plans to phase out the use of hotels for housing migrants by 2029 aim to reduce costs and stabilize the accommodation situation. However, the impact on the tourism sector is already being felt, particularly in regions where the presence of asylum seekers is higher. Local tourism businesses are calling for clearer solutions that do not disrupt their operations, as the unpredictability of protest activity makes long-term planning challenging.
How Protests Could Shape the Future of UK Tourism
As protests continue across the country, many are questioning the long-term consequences for the UK’s tourism sector. The growing public debate surrounding the housing of asylum seekers and the use of hotels is likely to affect the UK’s international image, potentially deterring tourists who are concerned about safety and stability. For countries that depend on tourism as a significant part of their economy, this could have far-reaching consequences, especially in cities that rely on foreign visitors.
The UK government’s plan to end the use of hotels for asylum seekers by 2029 may offer some relief, but there is concern about how the transition will unfold. Will the country be able to accommodate asylum seekers in other ways without disrupting local economies and tourism? The road ahead remains uncertain, as communities, businesses, and tourism stakeholders continue to voice their concerns.
Navigating the Challenges: Can UK Tourism Recover?
As the UK government moves forward with its plan to address the housing of asylum seekers, the question remains: How will this situation impact the future of UK tourism? Tourism, one of the country’s most valuable industries, depends on the perception of safety, stability, and accessibility. The growing protests and political unrest may have long-lasting effects on the sector, especially in areas where tourism is a primary driver of the economy.
However, the government’s eventual plans to reduce its reliance on hotels for housing migrants may offer hope for the recovery of the tourism industry. As businesses and local communities continue to navigate these challenges, a more stable and sustainable solution for housing asylum seekers could pave the way for the restoration of tourism flows.
BCD Travel surveyed 1,035 business travelers worldwide, capturing their accommodation preferences, booking and payment habits, and the challenges they face during their business trips.
Accommodations: Comfort, Location, and Employer Policies
Most business travelers choose mid-range (3*) or upper-class (4*) hotels, with location being the most important factor (77%). Employer policies (56%) and cost (53%) also play an important role. Occasional apartment dwellers prefer apartments for longer trips, as they offer more space and the ability to prepare meals and laundry.
Search, book, and pay
75% use their company’s online booking tool (OBT) to search for hotels, while 33% turn to hotel websites or apps. For booking, 84% again choose OBT, 20% directly through the hotel, and only 10% by phone. Three out of four pay with a corporate credit card, while virtual cards are rarely used.
75% of travelers say that their company sets a price cap for hotels, 10% say there are no limits, and 18% do not know.
Habits and preferences
Personal experience strongly influences choice: 77% prefer hotel chains with consistent service standards, while 73% stay in the same hotel on repeat visits to the same destination.
The most frequently used amenities are Wi-Fi and breakfast. Restaurants, parking, fitness centers, and flexible check-in/check-out are also popular. Travelers also value wellness amenities, such as bottled water, pools, spas, and healthy dining options.
Earning loyalty points is a strong motivator, especially in North America, where 99% are members of relevant programs. Overall, 80% participate in at least one program and 2/3 choose hotels that partner with them. 75% say they save points from business stays.
Problems and security
70% say they are satisfied with their company’s hotel policy and preferred suppliers. However, complaints are recorded about slow Wi-Fi, not including breakfast in the price, outdated rooms, and uncomfortable beds.
Security remains a concern: 30% said they did not feel safe due to the location, while 70% double-lock their room door.
Sustainability: Low Priority
50% rarely or never consider environmental factors when booking. 40% don’t consider sustainability at all, while only 20% look for features like eco-certification, reduced plastic, low carbon, water efficiency or limited cleaning.
BCD Travel says sustainability should be built into the hotel selection process and goals should be clearly communicated to travelers.
Strategy for the Future
As Teri Miller, BCD’s Executive Vice President, notes, a successful hotel program is “dynamic” and adapts to the needs of the market and travelers. With the hotel contract negotiation period underway, the company is providing tools and advice to better leverage programs and improve deals for 2026.
More than 10,000 hotels across Europe have joined a class action against Booking.com, and organizers have extended the deadline to join the lawsuit to Aug. 29.
The lawsuit’s participation deadline was initially set for July 31.
The complaint is being organized by HOTREC, a Brussels-based hospitality association that represents hotels, restaurants and cafes across 36 European countries, and 30-plus national hotel associations.
The class action stems from a September 2024 European Court of Justice ruling on a case between Booking.com and more than 60 German hotels and hospitality groups.
HOTREC says that the court found that Booking.com’s parity clauses violated EU competition law, preventing hotels from offering lower prices or better availability via their own websites or other OTAs.
“Hotels across Europe are entitled to claim compensation from Booking.com for the financial losses suffered,” said HOTREC in a statement, adding that “affected hotels may be eligible to recover a significant portion of commissions paid to Booking.com” between 2004 to 2024, plus interest.
“Now is the time to stand together and seek redress,” said HOTREC president Alexandros Vassilikos. “This collective action sends a strong message: abusive practices in the digital marketplace will not go unchallenged.”
Booking Holdings, the parent company of Booking.com, disputes the claims, with a spokesperson for the company calling statements made by HOTREC and other hotel associations “incorrect and misleading.”
“The ECJ ruling that HOTREC and other hotel associations have been referencing to validate a potential class action did not conclude that Booking.com’s price parity clauses were anticompetitive,” said the Booking Holdings spokesperson. “The ECJ was not even asked to assess whether our clauses had anticompetitive effects or any impact on competition. The court simply stated that such clauses fall within the scope of EU competition law and that their effects must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.”
The spokesperson added that the company has “not received any formal notification of a class action.”
HOTREC said the case is being coordinated through the Dutch-based Hotel Claims Alliance Foundation and will be heard in Netherlands courts.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login