Connect with us

Brand Stories

Elon Musk’s X deputy who ‘tried to ride the tiger’

Published

on


Linda Yaccarino insisted three weeks ago that little had changed when billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk merged X, the social platform that she headed, with xAI, his artificial intelligence group.

“I’m the CEO of X and my boss remains the same,” she told the Financial Times in an interview at the Cannes advertising conference.

Less than three weeks later, neither of those things was true.

Yaccarino on Wednesday announced she was stepping down from her role as chief executive after two years, noting X was “entering a new chapter” with the tie-up with xAI.

Industry insiders say Yaccarino was, in many ways, set up to fail.

She was tasked with bringing back advertising dollars to a platform whose politically polarising owner had told brands who did not spend with them to “go fuck themselves”.

Musk began heaping more pressure on Yaccarino and the pair failed to gel, said four people who worked with both of them. The billionaire’s blunt style clashed with his deputy’s Madison Avenue polish.

“Sheryl [Sandberg] found the rhythm with Mark [Zuckerberg],” said one of the people referring to the former chief operating officer of Meta and its CEO respectively. “Linda couldn’t find the rhythm with Elon.”

She successfully boosted X’s advertising business. But once Musk’s AI group xAI bought X for $45bn in March, “she had to question why she was there”, said Brian Wieser of Madison & Wall, an advertising consultancy.

Given Musk’s hands-on, round-the-clock approach to leading X, Yaccarino never had the kind of control that most CEOs enjoy.

Over the past six months, Musk had been distracted by his work with Donald Trump’s administration, which recently ended in a falling out with the US president.

Returning his sights to his businesses in recent weeks, the billionaire entrepreneur started making unilateral decisions at X — even within the advertising business that was the heart of Yaccarino’s role. His moves sometimes blindsided her and her team.

“Elon calls all the shots,” said one advertising executive, who knows Yaccarino and Musk, arguing her tenure had become particularly untenable over the past three months. “She tried to ride the tiger but was thrown off.”

Elon Musk, left, and Linda Yaccarino. Her defence of the X owner could stand in the way of a CEO role at another media or entertainment company, industry insiders said © AP

Known in the industry as the “Velvet Hammer”, Yaccarino joined X in 2023 after running the advertising business for NBCUniversal, where she was renowned for her full Rolodex and strong relationships with global brands.

She was given the task of wooing back advertising dollars after brands left in droves following Musk’s $44bn 2022 takeover of the platform — over concerns about his volatile management style and fears he was allowing toxic content to go unchecked.

Beyond advertising, she boosted X’s video features, clinched deals with creators and sports leagues, and developed X Money, a digital wallet and peer-to-peer payment service that is set to be released later in the year.

Yaccarino remained publicly loyal to Musk to the end. But some who worked with them believed her talent as a consummate salesperson hurt her relationship with him.

Musk felt Yaccarino was not being fully transparent about the company’s status with advertisers, and put a gloss on reality. He wanted her to more quickly restore the business to financial health.

“He did not dig her style as a shiny, flashy Madison Avenue executive,” said one person who worked with them both. “He wants to have an authentic conversation and not be bullshitted.”

Tensions flared about a year ago when Musk issued warnings to Yaccarino to accelerate growth and temporarily called in longtime lieutenant Steve Davis to review X’s finances and performance management. The billionaire later hired former Tubi executive Mahmoud Reza Banki as chief financial officer.

Banki reported directly to Musk, speaking to him frequently, cutting out the chief executive, one person said. Yaccarino’s relationship with Banki quickly became strained, said multiple people familiar with the matter.

Yaccarino wanted to allocate budget to content creator funds and bolstering X’s advertising technology, but Banki questioned her spending decisions and was directing investment to other areas of the company, enacting financial austerity, the people said.

Musk’s relationship with Yaccarino was also rocked after she helped secure a content deal in early 2024 with former CNN anchor Don Lemon that later blew up, according to two people familiar with the matter. After agreeing to the deal, Lemon conducted a contentious interview with Musk in which he asked if he abused drugs, infuriating the billionaire who then cancelled the partnership. Lemon is now suing Musk and X for breach of contract.  

The pressure took its toll on Yaccarino, said multiple people who worked with her, describing her as at times being tearful in the office.

Others note her toughness: “She lasted two years in a job that would have crushed most people in two weeks,” said one former colleague.

Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, right, with Discord CEO Jason Citron, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew and Yaccarino during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington in January
Linda Yaccarino, centre, listens as Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, right, speaks at a Senate committee hearing in Washington in January. To their left are Discord CEO Jason Citron, Snap boss Evan Spiegel, and TikTok’s CEO Shou Zi Chew © AP

Yaccarino also won the hard-fought battle to haul some advertisers back to the platform.

One year after Musk’s takeover, advertising had fallen about 50 per cent. Yaccarino turned on some of the world’s biggest brands by suing their trade group as well as several companies such as Shell and Pinterest for anti-competitive behaviour. X accused them of an “illegal boycott” of the platform.

Musk’s blossoming relationship with Trump added to the pressure on brands, which had started returning to X.

Market intelligence group Sensor Tower said X has “exhibited renewed strength in its advertiser base” citing “large and notable brands” such as Temu, Amazon, Apple, Google, Verizon and Dell among the top spenders on the platform in the US since January.

Research firm Emarketer projects X’s revenue will increase to $2.3bn this year, compared with $1.9bn a year ago. Global sales in 2022, when Musk took over, were $4.1bn.

However, some advertisers were resentful of Yaccarino’s methods.

“To her credit she did get advertisers back to X,” one longtime advertising executive said. “She did it with a gun, but they came back.”

Advertisers did not return “voluntarily or happily”, said Wieser. For some, “it was better to spend something” to avoid an X legal challenge.

Several marketing executives said toxic content was not the only problem. Yaccarino failed to make X an effective advertising platform that delivered a return on investment, they said.

“You could argue that she did not do enough to make the platform better for advertising,” said one advertising executive. “Many clients don’t advertise on X not because of the content, but because it does not perform very well.”

Still, Yaccarino appeared to be on a roll despite being financially constrained, and some insiders have praised her legacy. “It was Linda’s drive and energy and relentlessness that helped rebuild some of those relationships,” the former colleague said.

Things changed when Musk returned from his extended foray into politics.

“What saved her was the election and Elon diving deep into the administration, because then he took his eye off X a bit,” said one person who worked with them.

The merger with xAI came as Musk turned his focus back to the company.

“Now that he’s back into his businesses, he was never going to put her to be the head of an AI company at all,” the person said.

In recent weeks, Musk took several unilateral decisions around advertising, said people familiar with the matter. He banned hashtags from ads, and announced X would charge brands based on vertical size. He also hired Nikita Bier, an entrepreneur and high-profile X user, as head of product.

Yaccarino thought Musk was not focused enough on safety, an issue important to her, according to one person familiar with the matter.

Yaccarino informed a select few ahead of time of her departure. This coincided with xAI’s Grok chatbot on Wednesday spewing antisemitic hate, although the two were unrelated, according to X staff.

X and Yaccarino declined to comment. Musk did not reply to a request for comment.

It is unclear what comes next for the advertising veteran. Known as a committed Republican, her unwavering support for Trump and Musk surprised many advertising associates.

Her years-long defence of Musk could stand in the way of a CEO role at another media or entertainment company, according to industry insiders.

But the X role helped boost her connections in Washington.

She personally knows Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump, who has helped broker her relationship with the president, said people familiar with the matter.

She is also close friends with Scott Turner, the current secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the director of intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. One longtime confidante said Yaccarino remained strongly supportive of Trump despite his blow-up with Musk.

Some suspect her next move may be to take a role in the administration or as a free speech advocate. Yaccarino started wearing a diamond-studded necklace reading ‘Free Speech’ about a year into her leadership of X.

Mike Benz, an official in Trump’s first administration who now runs a free speech watchdog, praised Yaccarino on X after her resignation.

“She stepped up for all of us in the face of what seemed like insurmountable pressure from governments, advertisers, boycotters, banking institutions, and astroturfed lynch mobs,” he wrote. Yaccarino later shared the post.

“Prior to X, she was on the Mount Rushmore of ad executives,” said Lou Paskalis, chief executive of marketing consultancy AJL Advisory. “She doesn’t need to work, but she needs to go out in style. And I think that’s what’s next for her.”

Additional reporting by Daniel Thomas



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Brand Stories

US Military Expands AI Investment With $800 Million in Contracts

Published

on

By


The Pentagon recently awarded up to $200 million each to four U.S.-based artificial intelligence (AI) companies developing “frontier” models: Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and xAI. The contracts are the latest sign of AI adoption across the U.S. military.

The Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) said its goal was to accelerate the Department of Defense’s (DoD) adoption of agentic AI capabilities to “address national security challenges.”

CDAO head Doug Matty said the Defense Department wished to tap into the best technologies developed by U.S. AI companies to support its troops and maintain a strategic advantage.

The U.S. military is no slouch when it comes to technological innovation. For example, the DoD’s R&D armDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency or DARPAcreated Arpanet in 1969, a communications network that linked computers far apart. Arpanet later became the internet.

DARPA has contributed to the field of AI over the decades, backing everything from expert systems to autonomous vehicles. In 2023, it developed an AI system that autonomously piloted an F-16 and engaged in dogfighting scenarios with a human-piloted F-16. A year earlier, it debuted a Black Hawk helicopter piloted only by an AI system.

Commercially, enterprises are developing AI-powered products to sell to the military, including autonomous or semi-autonomous drones, surveillance and reconnaissance systems, targeting systems, signal intelligence, flight control and decision systems and the like.

AI is already being used across the military. Last month, the U.S. Air Force completed “Experiment 3,” which tested the pairing of human and AI systems to speed up responses to threats known as the “kill chain.”

One of the tools tested was the Maven Smart System, which used AI to give real-time suggestions to military teams about possible targets and actions. Humans still made the final call. The goal was to see if AI could enhance human decision-making — not to replace the people.

In March, the DoD’s Defense Innovation Unit kicked off “Thunderforge,” an AI-driven military planning effort co-developed with Google and Microsoft. The AI system integrates intelligence streams and battlefield sensor data to generate operational recommendations with humans in control.

Read more: PYMNTS Intelligence: Finding the Way to Better Government Disbursements

Risk Worth Embracing?

The military’s embrace of AI signals a realization that 21st century warfare is changing and the U.S. military must modernize to keep up.

“The U.S. ability to deter war in regions of critical interest is fading,” wrote Carol Kuntz, adjunct fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, in a June 2025 report titled “Artificial Intelligence and War.”

“Adversaries — particularly China — have improved their own capabilities and could now threaten classic U.S. power projection.

“AI-enabled military capabilities, particularly sensor and firing networks, combined with other force and program improvements, would be among the most promising strategies for shoring up deterrence and defense capabilities in the near- and mid-term,” Kuntz wrote.

But alongside the realization about the necessity of AI for warfare is a concern that these systems could make mistakes in judgment.

“If AI is to be used in war, decisions in the command center or the Situation Room would need to rely on predictions about the effects of the use of algorithms, particularly in sensitive applications,” Kuntz said. “Absent such predictive tools, AI-enabled military capabilities could not be responsibly authorized in uses such as a sensor and firing network.”

According to a 2024 Stanford and Georgia Tech paper that tested five language models in military and diplomatic decision-making, researchers found that all models took actions that escalated the fight.

“We observe that models tend to develop arms-race dynamics, leading to greater conflict, and in rare cases, even to the deployment of nuclear weapons,” the authors wrote.

The models justified their actions by saying they wanted to deter enemy actions by taking the first strike, according to the paper.

Nonetheless, AI model developers are forging ahead to sell their technology to the military. They have created dedicated business units to cater to the needs of the military and U.S. government. There’s Microsoft’s Azure for U.S. Government, Google for Government, Amazon’s AWS GovCloud, OpenAI for Government, xAI’s Grok for Government, Anthropic’s Claude Gov, among others.

In the end, despite AI’s inherent risks when deployed in warfare, the U.S. may not have a choice but to embrace the technology, especially since adversaries are not standing still.

“The United States is confronting the rise of a peer competitor, as well as a host of other military dangers and problems,” Kuntz said. “China fields precision guided munitions, hypersonic missiles and fighter aircraft increasingly able to pierce U.S. air superiority, capabilities that pose risks to classic U.S. power projection forces.”

“There is a reasonable basis to believe that AI-enabled military capabilities could help rectify many deficiencies in U.S. combat power,” she added.

Read more:

Visa: Digital-First Governments Use Payments Data to Improve Policy and Financial Access

Point & Pay Integrates Trustly’s Pay-by-Bank Tools for Government Payments

New Report: Instant Digital Disbursements Cut Through Government Red Tape



Source link

Continue Reading

Brand Stories

Credit cards that offer hotel perks: How they work and who should get one

Published

on

By


Several banks offer premium credit cards that provide hotel-specific benefits to cardholders. These cards typically include free stays, room upgrades, dining discounts, lounge access, loyalty programme upgrades, and bonus points for spending at partner hotels.

Some cards are co-branded with hotel chains, while others provide broad travel benefits across multiple brands.

Cards with hotel benefits (as compiled by Paisabazaar)

HSBC Taj Credit Card offers 25% savings on Taj hotel stays, room upgrades, dining discounts, free night stays and Taj InnerCircle Platinum membership.

Marriott Bonvoy HDFC Credit Card provides Marriott Bonvoy Silver Elite status, free night awards based on spending milestones, and Marriott Bonvoy Points on hotel and travel spends.

American Express Platinum Charge Card includes memberships with loyalty programmes such as Marriott Bonvoy Gold Elite, Hilton Honors Gold Elite, Taj Epicure Plus and others. Cardholders get room upgrades, complimentary breakfasts, and special rates at luxury hotels including Oberoi and Lalit.

Axis Bank Reserve Credit Card offers memberships like ITC Culinaire, Accor Plus and Club Marriott. Benefits include free night stays, dining discounts, room upgrades, and exclusive offers at partner hotels.

HDFC Infinia Credit Card (Metal Edition) provides Club Marriott membership, discounts and offers at ITC Hotels, and higher reward points on travel bookings through SmartBuy.

ALSO READ | How luxury hotels in India are evolving insurance practices with modern needs

ICICI Emeralde Private Metal Credit Card gives Taj Epicure membership, reward points on hotel bookings via iShop, and options to redeem points for hotel vouchers.

Axis Atlas Credit Card allows cardholders to earn EDGE Miles that can be converted into hotel loyalty points with partners like Accor, Wyndham, ITC and Marriott.

Hotels say these co-branded card tie-ups help build guest loyalty.

KB Kachru, Chairman, South Asia, Radisson Hotel Group, says, “Co-branded credit card partnerships are a powerful lever in enhancing guest loyalty and encouraging repeat stays. These collaborations extend the reach of our loyalty program beyond the hotel stay, allowing members to earn points on everyday purchases—making engagement with the brand more frequent and meaningful.”

He adds that Radisson has partnered with American Express and is exploring more local tie-ups to expand its base in India.

Arjun Baljee, Founder of Iconiqa and President of Royal Orchid Hotels, says, “Co-branded card partnerships help hotels remain top of wallet by allowing guests to earn points not only during stays but also through everyday spends, strengthening their transactional connection with the brand.”

Both hotel groups note that guests are redeeming more points and free night vouchers than before.

According to Kachru, redemption rates have increased, especially for leisure trips and festive stays. Baljee says guests often use points and vouchers on weekends and staycations.

Such premium hotel credit cards are generally used by frequent travellers and high spenders who stay at partner hotels and spend enough to benefit from loyalty rewards. Whether to use one depends on how often a person travels, their spending habits and if they can make full use of the perks relative to the annual fee, experts say.

ALSO READ | From points to perks: What hotel loyalty programmes are and who should join



Source link

Continue Reading

Brand Stories

Kakao, Naver step up global AI hunt amid fierce tech race

Published

on


South Korea’s internet pioneers, Kakao Corp. and Naver Corp., are ramping up overseas investments in artificial intelligence startups, shifting focus to North America in a move that is raising concerns among domestic startups over tighter funding at home.

After a two-year lull, both companies have resumed active startup investing but with a markedly global tilt.

The pair, which respectively backed about 20 startups annually during 2021–2022, have since cut that pace by more than half, according to Seoul-based tracker The VC.

Now, their investments are skewed toward US-based companies developing next-generation AI technologies in hopes of tapping innovations that align with their core platforms or open up new growth paths.

AI IS A MUST FOR ANOTHER LEAP  

According to the investment banking industry on Tuesday, Naver Cloud Corp., a cloud computing arm of Naver, recently led a Series A funding round for Urban Datalab, the developer of an AI medical platform, MeDiAuto, with its own investment of 3.5 billion won ($2.5 million).

Naver founder Lee Hae-jin announces the launch of Naver Ventures in Palo Alto on June 5, 2025 (Courtesy of Naver) 

Naver’s newly launched Naver Ventures also made its debut investment in TwelveLabs, a Silicon Valley-based startup with an unrivaled multimodal AI technology that has already attracted big-name backers, including Nvidia, Samsung Electronics Co. and Intel Corp.

“We are open to collaboration (between Naver and TwelveLabs) next year or later,” said Kim Sung-ho, head of Naver’s Immersive Media Platform team.

Naver’s renewed push into AI investing has gained further momentum since its founder Lee Hae-jin returned as chairman earlier this year.

“If David wants to beat Goliath, he must aim well with the right stone,” said Lee at a ceremony celebrating the opening of Naver Ventures, the company’s first dedicated overseas venture capital in Silicon Valley, last month. “We are in the middle of picking the right stone.”

In this analogy, Naver is the underdog battling US tech giants in the AI race.

Naver’s in-house corporate venturing (CV) team, D2SF, has also made a series of AI-focused investments this year.

(Graphics by Daeun Lee) 

It has invested in AI-powered logistics platform startup Techtaka; AI game developer Anchor Node; AI-supported autonomous driving technology developer whereable.ai; and multi-modal commerce AI startup Studio Lab.

Kakao has been similarly active in investing in AI companies.

According to The VC, Kakao Investment Co., Kakao’s venture investment arm, has recently invested 3 billion won in Seoul-based AI chip startup FurisosaAI Inc.

Its another venture capital company, Kakao Ventures Corp. has joined early-stage funding rounds of AI agent developer Tzafon and large language model startup Trillion Labs.

NORTH AMERICA EMERGES AS A NEW BATTLEGROUND

While the uptick in tech investment is a welcome shift after years of slowdown, Korean startups now worry they may be left behind.

Historically reliant on Kakao and Naver for early-stage capital, domestic startups fear the funding tide may be turning westward – just as global AI interest is surging.

(Graphics by Daeun Lee) 
(Graphics by Daeun Lee) 

Of five startups Naver D2SF has invested in 2024, three are US-based, including 3D content developer Claythis and YesPlz AI, a fashion-focused multimodal AI developer.

Kakao Ventures has also invested in FS2, a 3D AI chip design company led by MIT engineers; Oligo Space, an automated spacecraft design and production toolchain developer; and medTech startup Kompass Diagnostics.

To deepen its reach in the North American venture capital ecosystem, Naver opened D2SF’s US office in Silicon Valley last year and launched Naver Ventures in the global tech hub to scout growth-stage firms.

Kakao Ventures’ officials regularly visit the US once every two to three months to build ties with local VCs, engineers and researchers.

Investors see more room for upside in US startups than in their Korean counterparts, offering greater synergy.

Kakao Ventures meeting (Courtesy of Kakao Ventures)
Kakao Ventures meeting (Courtesy of Kakao Ventures)

“The ecosystem for tech-based startups is more mature in the US, and top US universities generate stronger pipelines of investable early-stage companies,” said an official from a Korean VC company.

The trend also reflects a strategic calculus, said industry observers.

Korean tech giants face less public scrutiny abroad compared to frequent domestic criticism over big tech firms’ aggressive M&A moves with startups after investment.

That’s prompting concern that capital could increasingly flow to overseas startups instead of bolstering the local tech scene.

“Startup funding is borderless,” said an official in the VC industry. “Without competitiveness to appeal globally, any startups won’t survive.”

Write to Eun-Yi Ko at koko@hankyung.com
Sookyung Seo edited this article.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 AISTORIZ. For enquiries email at prompt@travelstoriz.com