Connect with us

Brand Stories

AI revolution: How artificial intelligence is reshaping education and jobs in America

Published

on


Artificial intelligence has rapidly become a part of American’s lives. What once was a fringe concept a few years ago is now an everyday tool.

Its expansive reach affects what and how students study, as well as the job sector, prompting some to question how students and higher education at large should respond.

The best way an undergrad can prepare for an AI-altered workforce is to develop human qualities that machines cannot replicate, such as critical thinking, creativity, and social intelligence, some experts told The College Fix.

While the value of specific majors may diminish, careers in mental health, healthcare, and fields requiring high-level decision-making and management will remain viable, they said.

But make no mistake, the role of humans will increasingly center on collaboration with AI.

AI will be a job killer. It will also be a job creator.

While some jobs will be eliminated, others will be created.

“The amount of work that’s being created and the opportunities to both create and contribute are going to be expanded exponentially,” said corporate advisor Jack Myers, a University of Arizona lecturer in its School of Information Science.

Forecasts predicting the coming obsolescence of countless careers should be viewed “through the prism of not only what’s going to be eliminated, but what’s going to be created,” he told The College Fix in a telephone interview.

Jobs in coding, basic processing, routine bookkeeping, low-complexity customer service and translation will all soon be eliminated, Myers said.

But the opportunities ushered in by AI are going to be exceptional, said Myers, author of the book “The Tao of Leadership: Harmonizing Technological Innovation and Human Creativity in the AI Era.”

“If you look at almost any area of human creation,” Myers said, “it will be enhanced through the same type of collaborative partnership as if the creator was hiring an expert to assist and support in the process.”

Joey Kim, chair of the Department of Engineering and Computer Science at Master’s University, described AI as “simply a tool.”

“With the advent of new tools, careers do disappear,” Kim said in a telephone interview with The Fix. “There’s also careers that get modified…. It’s not simply binary and careers [either] remain unaffected or [become] obsolete. There is a spectrum.”

But like it or not, AI will be part of many jobs, said Michael Pavlin, an associate professor in the School of Business and Economics at Wilfrid Laurier University, who has been involved in AI research since the early 2000s and serves as the chair of his school’s management analytics program.

“It’s hard to imagine a white collar job where you’re not going to be interacting with AI at some level,” he said in a telephone interview.

However, despite recent AI advances, he said he remains “more on the skeptical side,” later adding he believes “we’re being a little bit oversold.”

Reva Freedman, an associate professor of computer science at Northern Illinois University with expertise in computational linguistics, said AI “is going to have a huge impact on the job market, but not different in kind to the effect that computerization had with the invention of the PC in 1983.”

“In offices, [b]efore the invention of the PC, lots of people had jobs as secretaries and clerks. Secretaries typed memos that other people wrote. Those jobs have been largely replaced by people using word processors themselves,” she said via email. “Clerks did a variety of jobs that have been automated by use of Excel and other software.”

The jobs that will survive require high-level thinking, management skills, or require hands-on work, such as medicine, Freedman said.

Gary Clemenceau, a “deep geek” turned chaplain and author, who claims 30 years of experience in tech, agrees. He told The Fix that “mental health and healthcare jobs, and anything that requires dealing with humans and higher-order thinking, will still be viable.”

AI and the dumbing-down of higher education

But will there be any higher-order thinking left?

“For teachers, it’s absolutely impossible to give a writing [assignment] today that students can’t cheat on,” Freedman said. “Even for an in-class assignment, you can now get glasses that allow you to look up stuff on the web during an exam.”

Kim said the misuse of AI in the classroom devalues a degree’s representation of how well one has been trained in a program and successfully met its requirements.

Freedman also expressed concerns over the misuse of AI in other segments of society, citing allegations it was used to write a recent MAHA report said to contain made-up citations.

Pavlin told The Fix he is more concerned about less obvious errors that require a greater level of expertise to detect. For example, when querying AI about esoteric subjects related to his research, he tends to find deeper ways in which AI makes mistakes than he would if he similarly asked AI a question about general relativity.

In that sense, AI is not bulletproof. Kim echoed similar sentiments: “When big important decisions must be made where it’s either life-or-death or costing millions and millions of dollars, you’re going to need something more than ChatGPT.”

Yet, as some of the scholars interviewed by The Fix noted, the increasing overuse of AI by students may lead to the attrition of capacities beyond their proficiency at using ChatGPT.

“I think it’s impacting their learning,” Pavlin said. “Not all students, but [there is] definitely a subset of students where I’m concerned about their critical thinking skills.”

AI and the college student

When asked how students could best prepare for the careers that await them in an AI-altered job market, most of the scholars interviewed recommended they develop their more uniquely human attributes.

“The machines are already smarter than the human brain in many instances,” Myers told The Fix. “[They have] been for a while and that’s just going to continue to become increasingly the norm.”

“So where does the human come in?” Myers asked rhetorically, answering that humans enter through the “collaborative process” and “the unique human qualities of the human brain.” These he said are developed in the social sciences and humanistic majors.

Clemenceau said students must develop their human qualities.

“Students need to put down their phones and THINK,” Clemenceau wrote in an email to The College Fix. “AI is not very good at being creative.”

Whether majoring in computer science and learning to code is still a wise choice was a point of some disagreement.

“Coding will be irrelevant as a tool or resource to bring to the table,” Myers said. “The AI is doing its own coding going forward. It doesn’t need the human coders anymore.”

In contrast, Freedman noted that people “have been saying ever since I was a beginning programmer (in the 70’s) that programs that can write programs were coming.”

“Is it more true now? Probably. Does that mean the [number] of programmers needed will go down? T[h]at’s a much harder question to answer.”

“I think there will always be room for people who care about the quality of their work, understand the business needs, and can communicate with non-programmers,” she said.

As for choosing a major, though, she added: “I don’t think students’ majors have a lot to do with their success in the work world; their personal qualities are a lot more important. So I don’t think we can tell students what majors will be more useful.”

Kim expressed similar sentiments, saying “I personally believe that with any major, if you’re going to be using your tools to your advantage, and if you’re really going to be motivated enough to not just follow the crowd, you will have a job.”

Clemenceau said the future may be bleaker than his optimistic peers.

“I see two roads,” he said via email. “A small percentage of people will reject AI as inhuman and soulless and empty, and take the ‘human road’ as much as possible, living more spiritual lives.”

However, he added, a “larger percentage of people will fully embrace AI and (sadly) sacrifice part of their humanity, becoming less creative, less able to think critically – and more easily manipulated.”

MORE: Using AI to write essays can impair brain function: MIT study

IMAGE CAPTION AND CREDIT: A graphic showing a laptop user employing AI / Supatman, CanvaPro

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter



Share our work - Thank you





Source link

Continue Reading

Brand Stories

Artificial Intelligence engines ignore black skin tones and African Hair texture – The Tanzania Times

Published

on








Identity Crisis: Artificial Intelligence engines ignore black skin tones and African Hair texture – The Tanzania Times





















Source link

Continue Reading

Brand Stories

Musk Hints at Kid-Friendly Version of AI Chatbot Grok

Published

on

By


Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot is about to spawn a new generation.

“We’re going to make Baby Grok, an app dedicated to kid-friendly content,” the billionaire wrote in a post on his X social media platform Saturday (July 19) night without offering further details.

Grok is the name of the AI model used by Musk’s xAI startup, introduced in November 2023 and touted for its sarcastic sense of humor as well as its reasoning capabilities. 

Musk’s comments about a kid-friendly version of the tool came a little more than a week after xAI debuted its newest version of Grok — Grok 4 — which the CEO called “the smartest AI in the world,” adding that in “some ways, it’s terrifying.”

As PYMNTS reported, Musk likened Grok 4 to a “super-genius child” in which the “right values” of truthfulness and a sense of honor must be instilled so society can benefit from its advances. 

Musk said Grok 4 was built to perform at the “post-graduate level” in many topics simultaneously, which no person can do. It can generate realistic visuals and tackle complex analytical tasks.

In addition, Musk said Grok 4 would score perfectly on SAT and graduate-level exams like GRE even without seeing the questions ahead of time.

Grok also encountered controversy this month when the chatbot praised Adolf Hitler in a conversation on X. xAI has since said it has taken action to ban hate speech.

In other AI news, PYMNTS wrote recently about the recent wave of funding for AI startups. For example, the AI search company Perplexity saw its valuation reach $18 billion following its latest funding round of $100 million.

“Capital raised by Perplexity, which has tripled its valuation over the past year, point to robust investor interest in the competitive AI search market especially for leading startups,” that report said. “Apple reportedly was interested in acquiring Perplexity.”

An even bigger funding round last week involved Thinking Machines, founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati. That company achieved a $10 billion valuation after raising $2 billion.

“We’re building multimodal AI that works with how you naturally interact with the world — through conversation, through sight, through the messy way we collaborate,” Murati said in a post on X.

Finally, reports emerged last week that Anthropic had been approached by investors with funding offers that could value the startup at $100 billion. The company’s valuation hit $61.5 billion earlier this year after a $3.5 billion fundraise.

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Brand Stories

India can reframe the Artificial Intelligence debate

Published

on

By


‘India must make a serious push to share AI capacity with the global majority’ 
| Photo Credit: Getty Images

Less than three years ago, ChatGPT dragged artificial intelligence (AI) out of research laboratories and into living rooms, classrooms and parliaments. Leaders sensed the shock waves instantly. Despite an already crowded summit calendar, three global gatherings on AI followed in quick succession. When New Delhi hosts the AI Impact Summit in February 2026, it can do more than break attendance records. It can show that governments, not just corporations, can steer AI for the public good.

India can bridge the divide

But the geopolitical climate is far from smooth. War continues in Ukraine. West Asia teeters between flareups. Trade walls are rising faster than regulators can respond. Even the Paris AI Summit (February 2025), meant to unify, ended in division. The United States and the United Kingdom rejected the final text. China welcomed it. The very forum meant to protect humanity’s digital future faces the risk of splintering. India has the standing and the credibility to bridge these divides.

India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology began preparations in earnest. In June, it launched a nationwide consultation through the MyGov platform. Students, researchers, startups, and civil society groups submitted ideas.

The brief was simple: show how AI can advance inclusive growth, improve development, and protect the planet. These ideas will shape the agenda and the final declaration. This turned the consultation into capital and gave India a democratic edge no previous host has enjoyed. Here are five suggestions rooted in India’s digital experience. They are modest in cost but can be rich in credibility.

Pledges and report cards

First, measure what matters. India’s digital tools prove that technology can serve everyone. Aadhaar provides secure identity to more than a billion people. The Unified Payments Interface (UPI) moves money in seconds. The Summit in 2026 can borrow that spirit. Each delegation could announce one clear goal to achieve within 12 months. A company might cut its data centre electricity use. A university could offer a free AI course for rural girls. A government might translate essential health advice into local languages using AI. All pledges could be listed on a public website and tracked through a scoreboard a year later. Report cards are more interesting than press releases.

Second, bring the global South to the front row. Half of humanity was missing from the leaders’ photo session at the first summit. That must not happen again. As a leader of the Global South, India must endeavour to have as wide a participation as possible.

India should also push for an AI for Billions Fund, seeded by development banks and Gulf investors, which could pay for cloud credits, fellowships and local language datasets. India could launch a multilingual model challenge for say 50 underserved languages and award prizes before the closing dinner. The message is simple: talent is everywhere, and not just in California or Beijing.

Third, create a common safety check. Since the Bletchley Summit in 2023 (or the AI Safety Summit 2023), experts have urged red teaming and stress tests. Many national AI safety institutes have sprung up. But no shared checklist exists. India could endeavour to broker them into a Global AI Safety Collaborative which can share red team scripts, incident logs and stress tests on any model above an agreed compute line. Our own institute can post an open evaluation kit with code and datasets for bias robustness.

Fourth, offer a usable middle road on rules. The United States fears heavy regulation. Europe rolls out its AI Act. China trusts state control. Most nations want something in between. India can voice that balance. It can draft a voluntary frontier AI code of conduct. Base it on the Seoul pledge but add teeth. Publish external red team results within 90 days. Disclose compute once it crosses a line. Provide an accident hotline. Voluntary yet specific.

Fifth, avoid fragmentation. Splintered summits serve no one. The U.S. and China eye each other across the frontier AI race. New Delhi cannot erase that tension but can blunt it. The summit agenda must be broad, inclusive, and focused on global good.

The path for India

India cannot craft a global AI authority in one week and should not try. It can stitch together what exists and make a serious push to share AI capacity with the global majority. If India can turn participation into progress, it will not just be hosting a summit. It will reframe its identity on a cutting edge issue.

Syed Akbaruddin is a former Indian Permanent Representative to the United Nations and, currently, Dean, Kautilya School of Public Policy, Hyderabad



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 AISTORIZ. For enquiries email at prompt@travelstoriz.com