Funding & Investment in Travel
Why Founders Should Skip VCs And Go Straight To LPs
By Hebron Sher
For years, startup founders have treated venture capital like a rite of passage — raise a round, land some splashy headlines, grow fast or die trying. But that playbook is worn out. And it doesn’t work for every company.
The VC model was built to swing for the fences. Which is fine — if you’re building the next Uber. But if you’re building a real business with real customers and real economics, you may find yourself trapped in a system that demands moonshots and punishes discipline.
Here’s the hard truth: most founders don’t need VCs. At least, not out of the gate. In many cases, it’s smarter to go straight to the source — limited partners, family offices, high-net-worth individuals. Skip the middleman. Source the capital. Keep your company.
Here are three reasons to consider this route.
VCs and founders are playing different games
Venture capital runs on a timer. Most funds have seven- to 10-year life cycles. That means VCs need you to exit at a specific time — whether or not it’s the right move for your company. Their incentives are tied to the fund, and to outliner returns, not to your timeline.
This can create a misalignment. You might want to build something durable. They want to 10x their money. That’s not inherently bad — but if you’re not aware of it, you’ll end up chasing someone else’s goals with your company.
Worse, big exits often don’t help founders as much as you think. If you’ve raised multiple rounds at ballooning valuations, even a $100 million exit can leave you with table scraps. Meanwhile, the VCs pull out a solid return and move on.
And let’s be honest: many VCs get theirs regardless. They earn fees whether your company wins or dies. You don’t.
LPs, on the other hand — the pension funds, family offices, and wealthy individuals who actually provide the money — tend to be more patient. When you go straight to them, you’re dealing with people who don’t need a return on a timeline. They’re happy with real value over time.
Too much money too soon might kill you
Everyone wants to raise a big round. It feels like momentum. But overcapitalization is a silent killer. It drives up burn. It forces you to hire too fast. It pushes you into fake growth before you’ve nailed product-market fit.
I’ve seen it happen: smart founders raise $10 million and suddenly feel pressure to act like a $100 million company. They start building teams for scale before they’ve built something people want. That pressure often comes from the boardroom. They lose focus.
If you raise from aligned angels or LPs, you raise what you need. Not what makes a headline.
That’s a better way to build. Lean. Focused. Controlled. When you grow on your own terms, you don’t need the startup hype cycle to validate your worth. Your customers will do that for you.
The past few years proved this. When the market tightened in 2022–2024, the companies that survived weren’t the ones who raised the most — they were the ones who ran tight, found traction and didn’t get addicted to outside capital.
Autonomy is everything
The second you take venture money, your company starts to become a group project. You’ll have new voices in the room, some helpful, some not. And you might still be running the company — but you’re no longer owning it.
Control is more than a board vote. It’s the ability to say no. To take your time. To build the thing you actually believe in.
Take Mailchimp. No VC money. Sold for $12 billion. Founders owned the whole thing. That’s an edge case, sure — but it proves what’s possible when you own your path.
Not every founder wants to blitzscale or IPO. Some want to build a profitable $50 million company that lasts. Some want to exit early and clean. Others want to go the distance. VCs often support one outcome: swing for the fences, or bust. LPs and direct investors? They’re often more flexible.
And let’s not forget: many angels and LPs are former operators themselves. They’ve been in the trenches and might actually have the time — and wisdom — to help you.
Venture capital isn’t evil by any means. It has its place. But it’s a tool — not a requirement. And not all tools are right for all jobs. So if you’re a founder thinking about your next raise, ask yourself: Do I need venture capital, or do I just want the status that comes with it? Can I build the next milestone with less money and more control? Who do I want sitting across the table from me when things get hard?
You may be shocked at what you can do with the right capital partners — especially when they’re not racing to flip your company on someone else’s schedule.
Skip the VC meeting. Call some LPs directly. You might just like the conversation better.
Hebron Sher is the co-founder and CEO of Zevo, a Dallas-based peer-to-peer EV sharing platform founded in 2021. Originally from London, Sher bootstrapped Zevo and later raised capital from a small group of high-net-worth individuals to build a 100% electric, contactless rental experience. His work focuses on making EVs more accessible, monetizable and usable for everyday drivers.
Illustration: Dom Guzman
Stay up to date with recent funding rounds, acquisitions, and more with the
Crunchbase Daily.
Funding & Investment in Travel
Q1FY26 Earnings – Ixigo Sees Potential In AI-Driven Travel Features
“When it comes to leveraging emerging AI models and tools, we have taken a forward-leaning experimental approach, both to enhance internal efficiencies and to power new customer-facing experiences. Currently, over 40% of our code is AI-generated”, stated Ixigo Director and Group Co-Chief Executive Officer Rajnish Kumar during the company’s Q1FY26 earnings call.
Remaining bullish on AI’s potential, Kumar claimed that agentic AI may pose risks for late adapters in the online travel agency (OTA) business. This contrasts with Ixigo, which adopted the technology in 2017 with its agentic travel assistant TARA and later ventured into other use cases. These include real-time fare trackers, price prediction agents, and autonomous web checking agents delivering boarding passes to users’ Apple or Google Wallets, among others.
Monetising other technologies
Building on AI integrations, stakeholders also questioned the impact of Ixigo’s travel guarantee feature on its flight ticketing business. Launched in the last quarter of FY25, this feature allows customers to avail refunds and discounts on alternate modes of transportation in cases of unconfirmed tickets.
While executives refrained from disclosing any financial metrics, they claimed that, given the low base of market penetration in this segment, there is still significant growth potential. This complements features like the travel guarantee, which could lead to potential upselling opportunities.
Impact of changes by IRCTC
Elsewhere, stakeholders discussed the impact of the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation’s (IRCTC) recent changes on Ixigo’s train segment business. In response, officials explained that there were three primary changes with varying levels of impact. Firstly, the aspect of reverting back to a delay time of 30 minutes from 10 minutes in Tatkal booking introduced some volatility. Secondly, while Aadhaar linking with Tatkal ticket booking remains fairly recent, it has had a slight impact on train bookings. And thirdly, executives opined that the preparation of seating charts eight hours in advance instead of four hours impacts booking volumes positively. However, they cautioned that the full consequences of the changes and their impact on consumer behaviour would take time to ascertain.
Decline in contribution margin percentage
Notably, investments in cross-selling products, such as the travel guarantee, led to a decrease in the contribution margin percentage. For context, this value dropped to 40.7% in the quarter from 47.7% in Q1FY25. Within this, the train segment contributed 32% to the overall contribution margin.
Growth in the bus segment
Elsewhere, analysts inquired whether external factors, such as elections, contributed to the growth in the bus business. While executives argued against any such events leaving a persistent impact, they referenced improvements in product for its growth in the past three quarters. This includes features like bus insights and the new Edge platform that translate into customer trust and conversion rate in bookings.
Perspective on the hotel business and ‘MICE’ activities
While Ixigo remains a new entrant into the hotel business, executives contended that the ‘room nights’ booked metric is displaying a strong month-on-month growth. Currently, the vertical remains focused on tackling the unsolved customer pain areas and supply-side problems, aiming to improve customer experience, the management added.
Advertisements
Differently, analysts queried officials on any plans to launch a B2B vertical with corporate tie-ups akin to their competitors. Without providing any specific timelines, executives expressed optimism around entry into these verticals in the future. For context, Ixigo’s rival Yatra saw a 103% year-over-year (YoY) revenue growth in Q4FY25, which it attributed to the MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, and Events) or corporate business, among other levers.
What expenses did Ixigo incur?
Coming to the expenses, the brand and advertising expenses in the quarter rose by 73.2% YoY to Rs 29.08 crore. This included celebrity-led advertisements in the train segment and cricketer-led campaigns on the bus segments, among other activities. However, the management termed this a “multi-year exercise”, noting that their impacts will be visible later.
Finally, analysts also probed the decrease in technology-related costs despite the first quarter performing strong seasonally. Notably, such costs increased in the previous quarter owing to a surge in queries like flight and train tracker. Clarifying this assumption, officials noted that technology costs get bunched up and should be viewed as a YoY metric instead of a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) analysis.
Also read:
Support our journalism:
For You
Source link
Funding & Investment in Travel
India-Thailand Trade Tourism: Dibrugarh Unveils Immense Opportunities
DIBRUGARH: A 14-member delegation from the Royal Thai Embassy, led by Minister Kiran Moongtin—an influential diplomat overseeing Thailand’s South Asian, Middle Eastern, and African Affairs Division—visited Dibrugarh on Thursday as part of an official tour to strengthen trade and tourism ties with Assam.
The visiting team engaged in a key discussion with officials from the Dibrugarh District Administration, the Industries and Commerce Department, and the Tourism Department. The meeting, held at the District Commissioner’s conference hall, also included representatives from the Tourist Guide Association, Tour Operators Association, and the Upper Assam Chambers of Commerce.
Welcoming the delegation, Dibrugarh Deputy Commissioner Bikram Kairi (IAS) termed the visit “historic” and expressed confidence in building enduring partnerships between Assam and Thailand.
Minister Moongtin highlighted the cultural linkages between Thailand and Assam, noting Dibrugarh’s unique reflection of Thai heritage and its potential as a hub for future cooperation in tourism and trade.
Tourism Directorate officials, including Joint Director Hriday Ranjan Das and Tourism Development Officers Manav Das and Nayanmoni Pamegam, were also present at the meeting.
The delegation concluded their visit with a tour of the Sri Sri Jagannath Temple, praising the spiritual ambiance and warm reception they received.
Funding & Investment in Travel
Startup M&A Crests Higher In First Half Of 2025
So far, this has been a pretty good year for startup acquisitions.
Acquirers made just over $100 billion worth of disclosed-price startup purchases 1 in the first half of 2025, per Crunchbase data. That’s a whopping 155% increase from the same period last year, showing buyers are increasingly willing to write big checks for sought-after companies.
Notably, roughly a third of this year’s total comes from a single deal: Google’s planned purchase of cybersecurity unicorn Wiz for a record-setting $32 billion. But there were other startups selling in multibillion-dollar acquisitions as well, including device designer Io and automation software provider Moveworks.
Dealmaking gets more frenetic
Deal count, meanwhile, has held steadier, with the number of announced acquisitions hovering in the mid-400s for the past three quarters. The number of M&A deals tends to be less influenced by market conditions, since buyers are inclined to go bargain hunting during down cycles and compete aggressively for hot companies during bullish ones.
Lately, the ambience leans more frenetic, particularly as pertains to AI. This was evidenced this past week, with the drama around AI coding provider Windsurf. The startup was about to sell to OpenAI for $3 billion until Google made a deal to hire its CEO and co-founder, Varun Mohan, and pay $2.4 billion for compensation and licensing.Then on Monday, AI startup Cognition announced it would acquire Windsurf.
AI was also the draw for the largest Q2 deal, OpenAI’s $6.5 billion acquisition of Io, a design startup co-founded by Jony Ive and focused on AI-powered devices.
Even with all the excitement around AI, however, the majority of M&A spending this year hasn’t gone to the space. Per Crunchbase data, only around $15 million of disclosed-price acquisitions were for AI startups in the first half of this year. (However, that excludes Wiz, which isn’t classified as an artificial intelligence company but does list AI security as one of its focus areas.)
Biggest H1 M&A deals
So where is M&A spending concentrating?
To get a sense, we used Crunchbase data to aggregate a list of 13 of the largest acquisitions in the first half of this year.
As shown above, besides AI, enterprise software fared well. Top deals in the space include Moveworks’ $2.85 billion acquisition by ServiceNow, as well as accounts payable platform Melio’s $2.5 billion sale to Xero.
In the healthcare space, electronic health record software provider Modernizing Medicine delivered one of the biggest outcomes, selling a majority stake to private equity firm Clearlake Capital Group at a reported $5.3 billion valuation.
Smaller and stealthier deals add up
The vast majority of startup acquisitions don’t have a disclosed price. But they can add up.
Oftentimes, these deals involve large-cap acquirers and well-funded startups. Examples from 2025 include Stripe’s acquisition of crypto wallet startup Privy, Snap’s purchase of school scheduling app Saturn Technologies, and Zscaler’s acquisition of cloud security startup Red Canary,
It helps acquirers that, four years after the venture funding peak in 2021, there’s still a large pipeline of funded companies taking a serious look at exit options. If current trends continue, we should see a growing number of them accomplishing that goal through M&A.
Related Crunchbase queries:
Related reading:
Illustration: Dom Guzman
Stay up to date with recent funding rounds, acquisitions, and more with the
Crunchbase Daily.
-
The Travel Revolution of Our Era3 weeks ago
‘AI is undeniably reshaping the core structure of the hospitality ecosystem’: Venu G Somineni
-
Brand Stories1 week ago
The Smart Way to Stay: How CheQin.AI Is Flipping Hotel Booking in Your Favor
-
Mergers & Acquisitions7 days ago
How Elon Musk’s rogue Grok chatbot became a cautionary AI tale
-
Brand Stories2 weeks ago
Voice AI Startup ElevenLabs Plans to Add Hubs Around the World
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
Amazon weighs further investment in Anthropic to deepen AI alliance
-
Asia Travel Pulse2 weeks ago
Looking For Adventure In Asia? Here Are 7 Epic Destinations You Need To Experience At Least Once – Zee News
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
UK crime agency arrests 4 people over cyber attacks on retailers
-
AI in Travel2 weeks ago
‘Will AI take my job?’ A trip to a Beijing fortune-telling bar to see what lies ahead | China
-
Mergers & Acquisitions2 weeks ago
ChatGPT — the last of the great romantics
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
EU pushes ahead with AI code of practice
You must be logged in to post a comment Login