The Brazilian government says it has offered accommodation for COP30 costing no more than $220 a night to representatives of some of the world’s poorest countries after African and Pacific delegations aired big concerns over the lack of affordable lodgings in the city of Belém.

Many of the rooms are offered on two cruise ships that will be docked in the Port of Outeiro – a 30-minute ride from the venue of the climate summit – providing 3,900 cabins and 6,000 beds. “These two large ships are part of a variety of lodging options designed to accommodate all COP30 attendees,” said Valter Correia, the special secretary for COP30 overseeing logistics for the summit.

In a statement, Brazil’s COP30 Presidency team said that these lodgings would first be offered to 98 of the “smallest developing countries and island nations”, with delegates from other countries able to book accommodation costing up to $600 a night at an unspecified time in the future.

Climate Home spoke to four climate negotiators from African and Pacific nations. None were satisfied with the COP30 presidency’s statement, saying that it came too late and the price caps were still too high and would price some developing countries out of participating.

A fifth negotiator – Adão Soares Barbosa from the Southeast Asian country of Timor-Leste – told Climate Home that his room has not been booked and $220 a night is “still too much for developing countries”.

Brazil’s Belém races to make room for COP30 influx

A spokesperson for the COP30 presidency told Climate Home the accommodation platform is “operational”, but it can only be accessed by those specifically invited to submit their information.

Anne Rasmussen, lead climate negotiator for the small island group AOSIS, told Climate Home that she had “seen the reports” on this offer and welcomed this initiative but was awaiting “formal communication” from the COP30 presidency.

Asked by email if only cruise ship cabins are listed on the platform, the COP30 presidency did not answer directly, saying only that “available accommodation will include all modalities such as hotels, vacation rentals and ships among others”.

Response to backlash

The COP30 Presidency statement comes three weeks after African and Pacific island nations said publicly that they were concerned that the cost of rooms could prevent them from joining in negotiations at COP30, where issues like adapting to climate change and transitioning away from fossil fuels will be discussed.

The United Nations subsidises the costs of up to three people from some developing countries – least developed countries and small island developing states – to attend COP talks. But the payment, known as a daily subsistence allowance (DSA), is capped based on living costs.

For the city of Belém, UN guidelines – which are not specific to COP – say the DSA should be $149 a day. The UN’s climate arm – which has a severely limited budget – has not said if this limit will be raised for the COP. An increase would involve the International Civil Service Commission, which sets the rates.

Because of the DSA rate, one negotiator representing one of the 98 governments offered the $220 cap said that “even with this supposed $220 price point, it’s still far beyond what most delegates can reasonably cover”.

“That doesn’t even account for the high cost of food and drinks at the venue”, they said, adding that if delegates are spending all of their DSA on accomodation then “they’re essentially being forced to pay out of pocket for everything else.”

“An exclusive COP”

“This is increasingly shaping up to be an exclusive COP where only those with big budgets can attend,” they said. “Civil society and media participation seem like an afterthought, and that’s incredibly worrying.”

Another negotiator from one of the 98 governments offered the cap agreed, saying that “wealthy countries are always OK” and “the rich developing countries will send limitless delegates” but “the poor will send however many are paid for”.

Negotiators from the 57 developing countries who were not offered the $220 a night cap were also dissatisfied. “$600 is way above the limit we have for our per person costs,”said one official from an African state, “it’s going to be really hard for us to participate if the accommodation situation is not resolved”.

“None of our delegation has booked as of yet and we’re urgently trying to resolve it but it’s just really expensive as of now”, they added.

Another from this group of 57 said the process for choosing which countries were offered the $220 a night cap was “opaque”. They pointed out that some countries whose governments were offered the cap have higher per person incomes than some of those who were not.

Kenya, which has been offered the cap, has a gross domestic product (GDP) per person nearly three times higher than that of Nigeria, which has not been offered the cap.

Asked about the criteria for choosing the 98 nations, the COP30 Presidency said it is “made up primarily of nations with lower development indices and small island developing states, as defined by the United Nations’ technical categories of Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS).” They did not explain why countries like Kenya, Sri Lanka and Nicaragua – who are not LDCs or SIDS – were chosen.

While rooms in Belém are listed on Airbnb for the COP30 dates for less than $100 a night, most governments and many companies and NGOs have rules against booking Airbnbs due to safety and other concerns.

Cruise ship emissions

Green shipping campaigners also criticised the pollution involved in using cruise ships to host COP30 delegates. The two ships – MSC Seaview and Costa Diadema – will rely on their onboard generators to power their air conditioners, televisions and other equipment, a COP30 spokesperson said, adding that “these generators use different types of fuel, ranging from conventional diesel to biodiesel.”

Together, the two ships emit over 140,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, according to EU data – more than entire Pacific island nations like Nauru and Kiribati.

Lucy Gillam, who runs an NGO called One Planet Port, told Climate Home the cruise ships are “a climate disaster” with a much higher carbon footprint than staying in a hotel. “I think it makes a farce of the COP,” she said.

Asked how people living near the cruise ships in Outeiro would be protected from the ships’ air pollution, the COP30 presidency did not respond directly. But their emailed response, a spokesperson said that all carbon emissions will be “fully offset, ensuring that COP30 is delivered as a net-zero-emissions conference”.

Holland America Line is again offering behind-the-scenes ship tours, providing an insider’s look at areas that are typically reserved for officers and crew.

These include the bridge, galley, engine control room, recycling center, main laundry and more, as well as meet the crew who make these areas run.

“We hear so often from guests who’d love to see the bridge or where our chefs prepare their meals. By bringing back this tour experience, we’re pulling back the curtain to these areas that are rarely visited,” said Carole Biencourt, Holland America Line’s vice president of onboard revenue.

“We’re giving guests a rare opportunity to see what makes our operation so unique. It’s a fascinating look at the inner workings of a cruise ship, and guests love meeting the crew members who work behind the scenes to create such a memorable experience,” added Biencourt.

The company said in a press release that the tours offer guests exclusive access to gain a deeper understanding of the systems and operations that enable the floating cities at sea to sail smoothly.

During the tour, several of the ship’s senior officers will meet with guests to offer expert insights. Guests who book the tour will receive a unique ship-specific lanyard, a souvenir photo collection and a commemorative certificate.

Tours will visit locations that showcase the breadth of operations on board, in addition to places such as the ship’s navigational bridge, galley and engine control room.

At each location, the tour will be met by a shipboard team member who will show the group around and give detailed information about the area and its contributions to the ship’s operation, the company added.

Guests could meet the captain or a bridge officer, chief or first engineer, environmental officer, provision master, executive chef, chief baker, entertainment cast member, bar manager and more.

Behind-the-scenes tours are available on select ships and are expected to be available fleetwide by the end of July. Behind-the-scenes tours are available for booking onboard at Guest Services and cost $179 per person, with an accessible option also available.

More than 140 people on a Royal Caribbean cruise suffered with the mystery illness, with passengers and crew experiencing vomiting, cramps and diarrhoea onboard Navigator of the Seas

A luxury cruise turned into a nightmare after a mystery illness impacted more than 140 people. A total of 134 passengers and seven crew members onboard the Royal Caribbean ship Navigator of the Seas reported grim symptoms including stomach cramps, diarrhoea and vomiting, according to the US-based Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

It is not clear what caused the outbreak on the cruise, which took passengers from Los Angeles in the US to Mexico and ended on July 11. The CDC said extra cleaning measures had been put in place by Royal Caribbean and those affected had been isolated.

“The health and safety of our guests, crew, and the communities we visit are our top priority,” a spokesperson for parent company Royal Caribbean Group told USA Today. “To maintain an environment that supports the highest levels of health and safety onboard our ships, we implement rigorous cleaning procedures, many of which far exceed public health guidelines.”

So far in 2025, 18 gastrointestinal illness outbreaks on cruise ships have reached a CDC threshold for public notification. There were 18 in the whole of 2024 and 14 in 2023.

Most cases are linked to norovirus, which can cause diarrhoea, vomiting, body aches including stomach pains, a headache and high temperature. It usually gets better in around two to three days.

This comes after an industry expert said small ship cruise lines may stop putting close-up images of polar bears in brochures because of new restrictions in Norway.

Akvile Marozaite, chief executive of UK-based global representative body Expedition Cruise Network, said limits on how close ships can get to the animals means the sector must change “how we communicate” with travellers.

Polar bears are a key draw for people embarking on sailings to Norwegian-ruled archipelago Svalbard, as they can be observed in their natural Arctic habit.

But concerns about interference from humans means the government has banned ships in the region from being closer than 500 metres from the animals.

Ms Marozaite said the sector is partly paying the price for “always talking about polar bears” in relation to Svalbard trips.

She told the PA news agency: “Of course they are something that people want to see, but expedition cruising to Svalbard is actually an incredible opportunity to experience a lot of other things about the destination.There is incredible human history, beautiful scenery, other species of wildlife.”

Ms Marozaite said cruise lines are continuing to show their guests polar bears, some by sailing closer to Greenland. The impact of Norway’s distance rule is “more to do with how we communicate”, she said.

“The communication around Arctic voyages is going to change. Companies hopefully will no longer be putting close-up images of polar bears on the brochure.

“That’s a good thing, because finally we will start talking about the destination the way it should be talked about.” But expedition leader and photographer Paul Goldstein criticised the new regulations.

He told The Independent’s travel podcast: “This is a classic example of what I term ‘conservation fascism’. I have led small ship charters in the region since 2004.

“Never once have I seen a single incident where tourists intimidate or affect the behaviour of polar bears.” He added that if a camera lens “the size of a Stinger missile” is required to see polar bears then most visitors will miss out.

Norway’s minister of climate and environment Andreas Bjelland Erikse previously said the rules are necessary as climate change is “leading to more difficult conditions for polar bears on Svalbard”.

He went on: “It is important for them to be able to search for food, hunt, rest and take care of their cubs without interference from humans.

“That is why we must keep a good distance.” The minimum distance will be reduced to 300 metres from July 1.

The Norwegian government said visitors to Svalbard have “a duty to retreat to a legal distance” if they encounter a polar bear that is too close. Ships are also banned from carrying more than 200 passengers in the region.