Connect with us

Rail & Road

Frauscher’s CTO on Modular Control and Digital Integration

Published

on


Frauscher Sensor Technology’s latest innovation, the Point Control System, is redefining railway signalling with its modular design, EULYNX compliance, and integrated predictive maintenance. Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Andrzej Bartnik explains how these advancements are enabling flexible upgrades, robust cybersecurity, and sustainable operations—empowering operators to future-proof their networks and accelerate digital transformation.

Andrzej Bartnik, CTO at Frauscher Sensor Technology

Railway Technology (RT): Congratulations on the Product Launches award. What does this recognition mean to Frauscher Sensor Technology at this stage in the company’s journey?

Andrzej Bartnik (AB): This award is a great recognition of our technological development and a strong confirmation of our strategic direction. As a trusted provider of object controller solutions, the launch of the Frauscher Point Control System at InnoTrans 2024 marked a major step in expanding our portfolio beyond train detection. It underlines our commitment to innovation and validates our focus on delivering safe and reliable object controller solutions for the global railway signalling industry.

©Frauscher

RT: How does the Point Control System align with Frauscher’s broader vision for innovation and digital transformation in the railway industry?

AB: The Frauscher Point Control System plays a key role in driving innovation and enabling the digital transformation of railway infrastructure. Our object controller solutions support the shift from traditional signalling systems to digitally controlled networks with decentralised interlocking technology, placing intelligence closer to the field elements.

By using standardised interfaces, the system acts as a technological link between point machines and interlocking systems. This approach enables the decoupling of component lifecycles and allows infrastructure operators to gradually modernise their networks without the need for full system replacement.

RT: EULYNX compliance is a key aspect of your solution. What were the main drivers behind your early adoption of these standards, and how do you see this shaping the future of railway signalling?

AB: Our early adoption of EULYNX standards was driven by the market need for interoperability, flexibility, and future-proofing in railway signalling systems. By complying with EULYNX, we ensure our solutions can be integrated seamlessly across different manufacturers and generations of equipment. We clearly see that many players within the industry have aligned on this standard by now and share efforts in developing this further. This empowers modernisation and modular upgrades whilst reducing overall complexity. That said, EULYNX will significantly shape the future of signalling. However, further solutions, such as our own Frauscher Safe Ethernet FSE protocol, will additionally support efficient ways of digitalisation in projects and markets not utilising the EULYNX specification.

RT: The system is designed for both new installations and upgrades of existing infrastructure. What challenges did you encounter in ensuring such flexibility?

AB: A key challenge was achieving operational flexibility by accommodating the wide variety of interfaces used by different point machines downstream. We needed to create a solution that unifies these diverse interfaces, simplifying lifecycle management and reducing efforts, spare parts complexity, and overall costs.

Another challenge was ensuring system modularity in order to serve a wide range of operational environments. The modular architecture of the system allows us to meet the requirements of both small stations and large, complex installations. It can be configured either as a single object controller or as a multi object controller setup, controlling up to 20 point machines through one communication channel. These point machines can control small turnouts independently or, when grouped in twos, threes, fours or more, can also control large-radius turnouts.

RT: Scalability and modularity are highlighted as core strengths. Can you share how this approach benefits railway operators in practical terms, especially in diverse operational environments?

AB: The Frauscher Point Control System is designed to be scalable and modular, allowing operators to adapt it to different station layouts. In wide-spread stations, object controllers can be distributed across several wayside cabinets, while in compact settings multiple controllers can be combined centrally. It also supports complex applications like large-radius turnouts with multiple point machines or combined control of elements such as moveable frogs—all within one modular system design.

Despite these varied configurations, communication to the interlocking system uses a unified channel. This simplifies integration and reduces planning, installation, and maintenance efforts throughout the system’s lifecycle.

©Frauscher

RT: Condition monitoring and predictive maintenance are increasingly important in rail operations. How has the integration of these features in your system impacted maintenance strategies for your clients?

AB: Our system integrates condition monitoring directly into the object controller, providing real-time data on the status and performance of point machines – without the need for additional measurement devices. This data is made available through standardised interfaces.

As a result, operators can transition from reactive to predictive maintenance strategies. Potential issues are detected early, allowing targeted interventions before failures occur. This reduces unplanned downtime, lowers maintenance costs, and increases overall system reliability.

RT: Cybersecurity and secure communication are critical in today’s connected railway networks. How does Frauscher address these concerns, and what feedback have you received from the market?

AB: Frauscher addresses cybersecurity concerns by synchronising safety and security lifecycles in the product development. For example, our Point Control System includes advanced security measures that enable its use in category 3 networks according to EN50159. Feedback from the market has been positive, highlighting the importance of object controllers fulfilling both safety and security requirements. This allows railway operators to benefit from secure remote access for data retrieval and software updates, while maintaining strong protection against cyberattacks.

©Frauscher

RT: The Point Control System is noted for its compact design and simplified installation. How do these attributes contribute to reducing project timelines and overall lifecycle costs?

AB: The compact design of the Point Control System minimises installation space, making it ideal for tight environments. Minimal cabling simplifies wiring on site, reducing project timelines as well as material and labour efforts. Maintenance and component replacement are also faster and easier.

Lower material use, small footprint, low energy consumption, and minimal heat generation reduce the system’s carbon footprint. Built-in cybersecurity with remote access further cuts wiring and on-site interventions. With a service life of up to 30 years, the system supports sustainable and cost-effective railway infrastructure.

RT: Is your system yet in operation somewhere round the globe and if there are any projects, what progress has been made so far?

AB: The most outstanding project so far is the “Digirail Project” in Finland. In cooperation with Mipro Oy, we are supplying our EULYNX-compliant object controllers for both point machines and train detection. This is one of the first installations taking full advantage of the possibilities created by standardisation, which enables operators to split tenders and pick from a broader range of offers and solutions – a trend which we’re not only observing in Europe, but also many other global railway markets. Within the project itself, a major milestone achieved so far has been the successful connection of subsystems and the interlocking, which marks a huge step towards full integration. Now we’re developing a mutual understanding of safety and security requirements and responsibilities to ultimately elaborate a common safety case, making sure the systems are protected as a whole.

RT: What’s your advice to railway operators and industry stakeholders considering the adoption of next-generation control systems?

AB: It’s important to start early with the adoption of next-generation control systems. Modern object controllers with standardised interfaces allow a step-by-step modernisation, enabling gradual integration without the need for full system replacements. This approach supports flexibility, reduces risk, and ensures a smoother transition to future-proof railway infrastructure.

“Future-Proofing Rail: Frauscher’s CTO on Modular Control and Digital Integration” was originally created and published by Railway Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.

 


The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Rail & Road

Hanoi speeds up metro and railway industry development

Published

on


Illustrative photo (H. Hieu)

The Hanoi Department of Construction announced it is accelerating steps to meet the goal of developing 15 urban railway lines, totaling about 600km, by 2045.

The city is currently rushing to complete procedures to begin construction on two urban railway lines in 2025, inclulding Line 2, Nam Thang Long – Tran Hung Dao section, 11.5km long, and Line 5, Van Cao – Hoa Lac section, 38.43km long.

This is part of Hanoi People’s Committee Resolution No188 to develop urban railways in three phases.

From 2024 to 2030, the city aims to complete about 96.8km, including Lines 2, 3, and 5, while preparing investments for 301km of Lines 1, extended 2A to Xuan Mai, Lines 4, 6, 7, 8, and those connecting satellite cities. The total estimated capital for this phase is about $14.6 billion.

From 2031 to 2035, Hanoi will complete an additional 301km of urban railways, with an estimated capital of about $22.57 billion. Once completed, urban railways will handle 35-40 percent of public passenger transport.

From 2036 to 2045, the city will complete the remaining 200.7km supplemented under the Capital Master Plan and revised General Plan. The estimated capital for this phase is $18.25 billion.

Developing the urban railway system will not only ease Hanoi’s urban traffic pressure but also promote sustainable, modern, and connected urban development. Once completed, the urban railway network will serve as the backbone of the public transport system, driving development in both the inner city and satellite urban areas.

Dang Huy Dong, Director of the Institute for Planning and Development Research, stated that completing the urban railway system in just under 12 years is a daunting task. 

It may not be feasible without integrating TOD (transit-oriented development) urban models along metro station routes. This requires exceptional management that goes beyond current investment and construction regulations.

According to Dong, without solutions for management mechanisms and funding, continued reliance on ODA loans will hinder Hanoi’s ability to complete its historic urban railway mission. To secure funding, TOD planning and auctions for real estate investment rights in these areas are essential.

Public transportation includes various types, but only urban railways can effectively address urban traffic issues in cities with populations of 5 million or more.

Hanoi will conduct a review of land ownership and usage along the corridors, project locations, and TOD planning areas of approved urban railway lines.

TOD area is developed around stations and stops of public transportation, focusing on creating living, working, and recreational spaces closely connected to these transport routes. The goal of TOD is to encourage the use of public transportation, reduce traffic congestion, and foster sustainable urban development.

VND17,509 billion railway complex

Hanoi People’s Committee has submitted a proposal to the Prime Minister regarding the location, scale, and boundaries of a railway industry complex project in southern Hanoi (in communes of Chuyen My and Ung Hoa, Hanoi, covering about 250 hectares).

Previously, Vietnam Railways Corporation proposed that competent authorities review and approve the investment policy for this project.

The proposed railway industry complex is a multifunctional facility, including a factory for manufacturing and assembling vehicles, equipment, and spare parts; a research center; a maintenance and repair center; infrastructure connections to the national railway; and supporting facilities.

The preliminary total investment for the railway industry complex is VND17,509 billion. Public investment will fund the railway line connecting to the national railway, technical infrastructure, an R&D center, and state-supported components. 

State capital injected into enterprises will fund the assembly plant and related components, while inviting investors to participate and collaborate in business operations.

If approved by authorities, the railway industry complex project will be prepared for investment within one year and constructed within three years to complete Phase 1 by 2029.

According to Vietnam Railways Corporation, the complex aims to produce domestically and gradually localize hardware and software components for information, signaling, and power supply systems; and master operations and maintenance. And it will produce certain spare parts for high-speed railways. It will also involve technology transfer, equipment investment, and production of locomotives and carriages for national railways with speeds below 200 km/h, as well as purchasing designs and manufacturing for urban railways.

The project will also establish a functional area for major repairs of all railway vehicles and equipment, initially focusing on national and urban railways.

N. Huyen 




Source link

Continue Reading

Rail & Road

Trial finds ‘world-first’ system protects tracks from damage

Published

on


A world-first system of shock absorbers made from recycled tyres has been shown to be effective in protecting railway tracks from damage.  

The new technology was tested over a two-year period by a collaborative team from the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney Trains, Transport for NSW, and industry partners EcoFlex and Bridgestone.

Researchers installed track sections with a rubber underlay made from tyres alongside conventional track sections for a direct comparison, monitoring vibration, track settlement, and ballast degradation at a live Sydney Trains freight line in Chullora. 

The results showed that the sections with the rubber underlay showed “significantly less degradation and greater stability”.  

To make the shock absorbers, tyre cells are placed in a specific layout made from recycled tyres infilled with waste materials such as spent ballast and coal wash. 

Recycled rubber grids cast from worn out conveyor belts from mining sites are also placed directly beneath the ballast.  

The technology addresses a long-standing engineering challenge: the high cost of maintaining conventional tracks. 

UTS researcher Distinguished Professor Buddhima Indraratna, the original inventor of this technique, and Director of the UTS Transport Research Centre, said the rubber-based underlay effectively protects the ballast, preventing it from being pulverised and extending the life of the entire track structure. 

“Additionally, the underlay controls the way the train load is distributed to the deeper, softer and often wet soil beneath the track, preventing unacceptable soil settlement and weakening of the overlying track.  

“This translates directly to lower maintenance costs, fewer track closures for the public, and improved network reliability.” 

Dr Richard Kelly, Chief Technical Principal for Geotechnical Engineering at SMEC Australia and an advisor on this project, said: “If widely adopted by railway asset owners, this will save Australian rail industry millions of dollars annually by reducing the demand for freshly quarried rock for ballast that is very expensive and not carbon friendly.” 

The project also provides a novel way to address tyre waste – with over 50 million end-of-life tyres generated in Australia each year.  

“We have proven we can turn a significant waste stream into a high-value asset that makes our critical infrastructure more resilient and advances the circular economy,” said Professor Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn from the UTS Transport Research Centre. 

The research team will now expand its work through a $740,000 Australian Research Council Linkage Project grant, testing the technology in more challenging locations – such as at bridge approaches and junctions, where abrupt changes in track stiffness create high-impact zones prone to rapid degradation. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Rail & Road

Union Pacific exploring Norfolk Southern rail takeover, reports say

Published

on


Open this photo in gallery:

A Norfolk Southern train in North Carolina in 2022. Union Pacific is reportedly looking at buying its competitor, a deal that would shake up the U.S. freight rail landscape if it materializes.Jonathan Drake/Reuters

Union Pacific, the largest U.S. freight railroad operator, is exploring a possible acquisition of Norfolk Southern to create a US$200-billion coast-to-coast rail network, a person familiar with the matter said.

Talks are in early stages, the person said, with no guarantee talks will progress or that any deal would pass what would be expected to be a lengthy, detailed regulatory review. The two companies declined to comment.

Any deal to unite two of the six largest freight rail operators in North America is likely to draw intense regulatory scrutiny. Major shippers in the steel, chemical and grain industries are expected to lobby against any further concentration in an industry that has consolidated from over 100 Class I railroads in the 1950s to just six today.

Union Pacific UNP-N shares fell 2.7 per cent in Friday afternoon trading, while Norfolk Southern NSC-N rose 1.52 per cent.

A combination would mark a shift in the U.S. freight rail landscape, creating a single-line network stretching from coast to coast, changing the current divide between western and eastern regional operators.

Norfolk is recovering from a tumultuous past couple of years that included the firing of its previous CEO amid ethics investigations, a boardroom battle with activist Ancora, and a train derailment that cost the company about $1.4-billion.

A merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern would create the first modern West-to-East single-line freight railroad in the U.S.

Earlier this year, Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena said a transcontinental merger would be good for customers, eliminating the need for interchanges between carriers in Chicago – a longstanding bottleneck – and reducing costly delays for shippers.

But critics warn that such consolidation could reduce competition, a possible concern for regulators. With fewer major players in the market, shippers may face higher costs and diminished service options.

“We suspect certain shipper groups could get vocal on the perceived lost competition a merger would bring,” Barclays analyst Brandon R. Oglenski said.

Discussions between the two operators, first disclosed by Semafor, spurred speculation that competitors would also consider concentration.

“History teaches that mergers and acquisitions within the railroad industry will inspire and motivate additional M&A,” said Mike Steenhoek, executive director of the Soy Transportation Coalition.

That happened earlier this decade when Canadian Pacific offered to acquire Kansas City Southern, which prompted CP’s main competitor – Canadian National – to submit their own offer to acquire Kansas City Southern.

Ultimately the Canadian National offer was not allowed to proceed, and Canadian Pacific did acquire Kansas City Southern in 2023 – creating the first railroad to link Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.

In 2024, Union Pacific led the industry with $24.3-billion in revenue, followed by BNSF (privately held, owned by Berkshire Hathaway), CSX CSX-Q, Canadian National CNR-T, Norfolk and Canadian Pacific Kansas City CP-T.

“The energy and momentum toward the remaining two U.S. based Class I railroads – BNSF and CSX – pursuing a merger would be considerable,” Steenhoek said.

A regulatory decision could take 16 to 22 months, with merging carriers required to notify the Surface Transportation Board three to six months before filing an application, followed by a year-long evidentiary review and a final ruling within 90 days, Oglenski said.

A potential Union Pacific acquisition of Norfolk Southern could have material synergy, he said.

“Any deal would face serious review from regulators,” said Emily Nasseff Mitsch, equity analyst at CFRA.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 AISTORIZ. For enquiries email at prompt@travelstoriz.com