Connect with us

Ways to Travel

The Best Men’s Travel Pants of 2025

Published

on


Have your flights booked? We’ve got your backside covered with the best men’s travel pants on the market for 2025.

From the Andean cloud forests to deep desert canyons, to long backcountry road trips and Parisian markets, these pants have been tested to tackle any adventure and do it all in style. Our travel-worn team has beaten paths around the globe in these slacks, and we’ve tested over 150 different pairs for almost a decade now. If it’s got the right stuff, we’ve saddled up in a pair.

Guide author Steve Graepel leads our efforts, and he’s hot-footed it around the globe a not-small number of times for this line-up. His eye for functional fashion is dialed in, and we consider all facets of these pants, down to the stitch lines, pocket placement, and button style.

Whether space in your carry on is slim and you need a one-and-done perfect pair, like our top choice Bluffworks Envoy Lightweights, or want to pad out your travel closet with a few more spend-wise options like the UNIONBAY Rainier Travel Chinos to get you through trips without a stop to the laundromat, we think our recommendations are right on the money.

Editor’s Note: We updated our Travel Pants guide on May 17, 2025, with an eye toward summer, and have added three additional travel pants that we think deserve a spot in your luggage: The RHONE Commuter, KUIU Bridger, and Stio Vallis.

The Best Men’s Travel Pants of 2025

Best Overall Men’s Travel Pants











9.0/10 Rating

Best Budget Men’s Travel Pants











6.5/10 Rating

Best Travel Pants for Adventuring In











7.8/10 Rating

Best Travel 5-Pocket Style Pant











8.4/10 Rating

Most Fashion-Forward Travel Pants











8.2/10 Rating

See more picks


Best Overall Men’s Travel Pants


  • Lightweight fabric dries quickly

  • Wrinkle resistant

  • Looks and feels more recreational than the Ascenders

  • Anti-UV properties

  • More comfortable than most pants on the list


  • The rear device pocket is hard to access when seated

  • Lacks a DWR

Best Budget Men’s Travel Pants


  • Comfortable

  • Security options

  • Well priced


  • Pants run long

  • Material tends to collect lint

Best Travel Pants for Adventuring In


  • Form and function meet the apex pant

  • Bomber hardware

  • Tons of pockets with versatile security options


  • DWR is negligible

  • Styling is less formal

Best Travel 5-Pocket Style Pant


  • Lightweight material breathes just as well as the first

  • More durability than the first iteration

  • Fantastic fit and construction

  • Better mobility than the first iteration


  • New fabric feels slightly stiffer (breaks in over time)

  • Single security pocket is limiting for some travelers

Most Fashion-Forward Travel Pants


  • Very comfortable

  • Good pocket layout with clean storage options

  • Fashionably cut

  • Phone sleeve is easy to use and stays out of the way of the hip joint when seated

  • Stretchiness is achieved without weaving in spandex

  • Robust DWR


  • Polyester can hold smell and isn’t as durable as nylon

  • Pocket flaps make it harder to access rear zippered contents

  • Bunched elastic waist hem takes away from the clean lines of the pant

Other Travel Pants to Take You There

We think that the five pants above are perfect for cycling through the week on your travels, but there’s certainly other options we’ve tested and enjoyed as well. Check out the eight alternates below to help diversify your travel closet.


  • Pre-treated with an insect repellant

  • Stain resistant

  • Internal drawstring for extra waist security

  • Three zipper-closed pockets

  • Lightweight

  • SPF 50

  • Tanto-style pocket to clip your EDC


  • Magnetic closure catches on anything metal

  • No durable water repellant finish


  • Stretchy waistband

  • 4-way stretch

  • Closes with two buttons

  • Best-in-class coin pocket

  • 7 functional pockets


  • Zippered slash pocket is small

  • Runs small and has limited waist sizes (32, 34, 36, 38)

  • “Casual fit” runs slim

  • Inseam is short and somewhat restrictive


  • Overstitched and oversewn seams are durable and minimal

  • Three mesh lined pockets zip shut for security

  • Comes with the clean and functional design Arc’teryx is known for

  • Wind and water resistant


  • Expensive

  • Thigh pocket has too much room to prevent a phone from bouncing around

  • No rear pockets (common in joggers)


  • Great updated fit

  • Minimal design

  • Best rear pocket zipper pull in the business


  • Coin pocket is uselessly small; We’d like to see this sized up, following the general trend in travel pants


  • Merino wool!

  • Stylish

  • Gusseted crotch

  • Good fit and stretch

  • Available in odd and even waist sizes, in lengths 30-34


  • Pricey — No longer $200, the pants are still expensive at $170

  • Weighs an ounce or two more than other similar pants

  • Lacks a dedicated device pocket

  • After a year of use, the seat is beginning to pill


  • Light and packable

  • Durable and stretchy

  • KÜHL drop in style pockets are fantastic


  • Fabric is noisy

  • No button-no fly minimalism may not appeal to everyone

  • Only one zippered pocket on the backside


  • Gusseted design gives a great fit

  • Reflective details on cuffs

  • Made in USA


  • Not many; an extra pocket or a drop-in phone sleeve, and these would be our top choice for travel pants


  • Good stretch

  • Comfortable fit

  • Drawstring and belt loops


  • Only available in a 32 inseam

  • Pants stretch and lightly pill over time

  • Front occasionally unbuttons too easily


  • Nice balance of cotton, nylon, spandex for soft durable fabric that drapes well

  • Love the utility pocket

  • Good DWR

  • Nice device pocket on the right thigh holds the phone securely

  • At 10 ounces, they are the lightest pants on the list


  • Size is slightly off most pants

  • Rides high in the crotch

  • Tight in quads

  • Rear zippered pocket is smallish


  • Light

  • Breathable

  • Strong pocket layout

  • Great fit

  • PFAS-free DWR


  • Unstructured material allows phone to flop in device pocket

  • While Stio is known for durable outdoor clothes, 100% polyester may be less durable than nylon pants on the list


  • Clean styling

  • Traditional 5-pocket design has a zippered security and functional coin pocket that can sleeve a phone

  • Flex-nit polyester is comfortable a quiet


  • Not as durable as other pants on the list

  • No DWR but dries very quickly

Men’s Travel Pants Comparison Chart

Travel Pants Price Fabric Fabric Weight Weight DWR
Bluffworks Envoy Lightweight Travel Pants
$125 57% recycled polyester, 33% polyester, 10% spandex 210 gsm 15 oz. No
UNIONBAY Rainier Travel Chinos $40 94% nylon, 6% spandex 173 gsm 13 oz. Yes
LIVSN Ecotrek Trail Pants $129 70% Blue Ocean nylon, 25% nylon, 5% spandex 173 gsm 13 oz. Yes
Western Rise Evolution 2 Pants $128 90% nylon, 10% elastane 107 gsm 11 oz. Yes
Jack Archer Jetsetter Tech Pant
$89 100% PTT polyester fibers 178 gsm 12 oz. No
Teren Lightweight Traveler Pants
$130 88% nylon, 12% spandex 154 gsm 11 oz. No
Nomatic Outset Pants $130 100% polyester warp knit Unknown 14 oz. Yes
Arc’teryx Gamma Jogger $200 Fortius DW 2.0 (nylon) softshell Unknown 12 oz. Yes
Public Rec Dealmaker Pants $128 100% polyester Unknown 11 oz. Yes
Proof 72-Hour Merino Travel Pant $198 47% merino wool, 33% nylon, 14% polyester, 6% elastane 247 gsm 1 lb., 0.5 oz. No
KÜHL Suppressor Jogger $99 85% nylon, 15% spandex 165 gsm 12 oz. Yes
Ornot Mission Pants $148 95% nylon, 5% elastane 232 gsm 14 oz. Yes
Jetty Acadia 2.0 Utility Pant $100 100% polyester 240 gsm 16 oz. No
KUIU Bridger Pants $109 66% cotton, 30% nylon, 4% spandex Unknown 10 oz. Yes
Stio Vallis Pants $130 100% polyester 155 gsm 11 oz. Yes
RHONE Commuter Pants $138 Flex-knit fabric with polyester Unknown 13 oz. No
Testing in Japan recently; (photo/Steve Graepel)

How We Tested the Best Men’s Travel Pants

There are few other products we test at GearJunkie that are considered non-negotiable in society. Outside the house, you gotta wear pants (or shorts). And if you’re choosing shorts, you’re probably not looking at the right pants.

Travel pants are part of our everyday uniform, allowing us to test them daily. We test pants for the office grind, after-school errands, dispatching weekend chores, and yes, of course, travel, constantly logging test hours to find the best travel pants on the market.

Our Testing Process and Testing Grounds

Airports can be uncomfortable, so do yourself a favor and spend your travel days in the most comfortable pants you can find; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Cozy in coach, capable of tackling adventure, but formal enough to wear to dinner, travel pants span the use case spectrum. We’ve worn them on intercontinental flights to Europe, Asia, and South America, as well as transcontinental flights from Jacksonville to the Intermountain States.

In warmer climates, we’ve pulled them out of our bikepacking bags on cool nights in Nicaragua and high up on the Colombian Coffee Triangle. One tester even wore his pair to the top of the Grand Teton.

When we get our hands on a new pant, we first take a look at the materials. We gauge the fabric weight, breathability, and the material’s ability to resist wrinkling. Synthetics with a DWR will pack down smaller, bounce back from being jammed in luggage on an overnight flight, and resist stains (and spills) better than cotton.

A touch of spandex affords some stretch and nylon tends to be more durable. We then turn them inside out to look at the seams joining the pants together, looking at where costs were cut and potential quality issues might cause a blowout on the road.

Riding out one of Japan’s infamous spring storms and testing DWR finishes; (photo/Steve Graepel)

To be considered for our list, pants need at least one pocket that can be zipped shut to safely secure a passport or wallet. The hand pockets should be deep enough to keep keys and change from accidentally spilling out, or have zippers that prevent mishaps. No joke, one pair of pants we tested (not on this list) spit a wallet out at work without us even knowing it.

We then evaluated each pant’s fit, durability, packability, ability to bounce back from repeated wash and wear, and unpacking. We want to find out if a pair of pants can be washed in the sink in the evening and be ready to wear the following morning.

We want to see if the material resists wrinkling. And we want to know if the pants are cut too large, too small, or hike up the legs. The best material and construction alone can’t fake a good fit. We test pants for mobility and proper length. Does the pant bind in the crotch? Are the gussets appropriate? Are the legs cut at a proper length or do they ride up when walking?

Our testing focuses primarily on comfort, versatility, and functionality when in transit, so if you’re looking for something more durable for active pursuits, check out our picks for the best hiking pants. We also have a guide for the best women’s travel pants to get your travel companion ready for the long haul.

(Photo/Steve Graepel)

Our Expert Testers

Steve Graepel has been leading the men’s travel pant buyer guide since 2015. Over the span of 8 years, Graepel has seen over 240 pairs of travel pants, rigorously testing 155 pants. Graepel has worked at GearJunkie as a contributing editor since 2009, testing everything from packrafts, to bike bags, sleeping bags, winter boots, and trail runners.

His latest beat is travel pants, flannels, and men’s wallets. Before his time as a “fashion blogger,” he wrote for Travel Idaho, National Geographic Adventure, Patagonia’s Tin Shed, Trail Runner, and Gear Patrol.

Graepel has researched and tested travel pants extensively — traveling, working, and camping in the high alpine desert of Idaho, Montana, and Utah, and traveling abroad in a variety of environments including Europe, Asia, Central, and South America. He continues to test travel pants year-round and searches for anyone who will listen to his yarns about the best travel trousers.

In 2020, we tried 27 pairs and listed 15 pants on our men’s buyers guide. In 2021, we tested an additional 35 pairs, highlighting nine new pants on our list. In 2022, we saw an additional 23 pairs, adding six new pants.

In 2023 we looked at 38 pairs, adding seven new pants to the men’s travel pant buyer’s guide. In 2024, we reviewed 30 pants, updating our Men’s Travel Pants buyer guide with nine new pants. And finally, for 2025, we tested 16 new pants, adding six pants to our latest buyer’s guide.

Each year introduces new styles and materials, and we try to reflect the best on the market of that year. Many trousers remain on the list, year after year. They are either so good, or so good of a deal, that they are tough to topple.

To keep a finger on the pulse of pants, we read reviews from top sites and contact manufacturers directly. Steve Graepel has regular conversations with pant brand owners and representatives in the travel pant space. These relationships allow us to stay up to date on what makes pants better every year, and keep an eye on sleeper pants that just don’t have the marketing budget to get mass attention.

A good pair of travel pants should look great as you explore the streets of foreign cities, but they should also be rugged enough to handle side excursions; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose Travel Pants

Fit

Regardless of whether the pants are straight-leg or slim, a good pair is one that follows the human form and doesn’t bag out after repeated washings, or bloat when packed with your phone and keys. The length should fit your inseam or run longer so you can roll them up or get them tailored.

Almost every pant on our list has a great fit. If they didn’t, we’ve shared the cons. Both Jetty’s and UNIONBAY’s pants run a little long. Nomatic’s Outset is a touch slim. Proof, Jack Archer, Rhone, and Public Rec offer a variety of inseams for a dialed fit (from 30″ to 36″). To dial in the fit of the waist for models with belt loops, we typically try to find a travel and adventure-friendly belt that allows us to get through TSA without needing to remove it.

Travel pants should sport a similar fit to what you normally enjoy; (photo/Emily Malone)

Function

We scored each pant for both its ability to adventure, wear in coach, and hit the streets. Some pants, like Arc’teryx , have a bias for stout use. The Gamma Joggers are coated with a solid DWR and are our choice for adventure trips where you can’t sacrifice durability.

If traveling by plane, we prefer comfortable pants with accessible pockets. While five-pocket styled jeans or chinos wear well on the street, their pockets are harder to access when sitting on the plane. So we usually prefer a comfortable jogger or cargo pant that has vertical zippered pockets and drop-in device pockets on the legs.

KÜHL and KUIU both have accessible pockets while seated in the plane. Nomatic has a clever slash-style coin pocket that works better than most. The angled entry is forgiving when trying to extract the phone. Arc’teryx has a large map pocket that rides over the leg.

For comfort in coach, you don’t need to look past Bluffworks Envoy. They look great and have plenty of pockets to stay organized. KÜHL’s Suppressor Jogger dialed the drop-in pockets and is lightweight and durable, but the material isn’t nearly as soft as KUIU’s soft cotton blend. It’s always a trade-off.

Pocket accessibility has a huge impact on your day-to-day use, so consider your options wisely; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Style Matters

While comfort is key, we also need to be able to show ourselves in public (no washed-out gray sweatpants on this list). The most versatile travel clothes should be able to tackle a hike without getting roughed up, or walk into town looking sharp enough to peruse a museum, and duck in for fine dining afterward.

Unfortunately, the cargo pockets take away some formality while out on the town. With its jogger styling, neither Arc’teryx nor KÜHL designed around Michelin stars. They prioritize function and durability, mapping to utility. KÜHL, KUIU, and Stio each have unique cargo styling that brings a touch of modernity to the military-inspired side-pocket pants. In general, we love cargo-style pants and joggers while sitting on the plane. It keeps all your essentials within reach.

On the other hand, Western Rise’s Evolution 2, Rhone, Public Rec, and Proof’s 72-Hour Merino are fantastically styled everyday pants with a single security pocket to maintain that sleek look. They are our go-to choice for travels to big cities where we want to kick up the look and feel at home while traveling abroad. For equal fashion-forward looks with more security pockets, we were thrilled to see Jack Archer’s Jetsetter Tech Chino, and we look forward to testing them more on future trips.

Clean lines, darker colors, and traditional styling help you blend into crowds and stave off the would-be pickpocket’s radar. The best men’s travel pants should look as good as they feel without shouting “tourist.”

The material should be lightweight and, in our preference, darker to minimize showing the dirt collected along the way. That said, we were astounded by how well a fresh DWR can resist stains on even the fairest beige pants.

(Photo/Steve Graepel)

Fabric Weight

Lightweight performance fabrics can withstand repeated washings in a sink, line dry overnight, and stay wrinkle-free after weeks on the go. Today’s fabrics offer advanced sun protection and moisture-wicking properties and are often water-resistant or water-repellent, and can even repel insects.

Fabric weight is measured in grams per square meter (GSM). A heavier GSM will take up more room in your bag and take longer to dry. We find a 200-ish GSM fabric weight, like on our top pick from Bluffworks, light and breezy, and dries out quickly.

A welterweight fabric will disappear in the bag and dry out insanely fast, but going too light sacrifices durability. All the pants we tested are durable enough to venture off the pavement.

If you want the lightest pant you can find, give KUIU’s a look. The cotton-nylon-spandex blend is comfortable, water resistant, breathes well, and rolls up tight and is exceptionally durable. Western Rise also uses a lighter-weight GSM fabric, but the pants weigh more overall.

Travel pant fabrics should be breathable, durable, and easy to clean; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Fabric Type

A cotton blend fabric adds breathability and a cooling effect, which is great for warmer climates, but can also sacrifice durability. And, unless treated with a DWR, cotton can wet out more easily and hold water longer.

Some pants weave cotton into their blend. To beef up the durability, the natural fiber is woven with a synthetic like polyester or nylon and an elastic component for stretch. KUIU does a great job of finding the sweet spot.

If you choose to go with denim or cotton, consider a stretchy fabric with a bit of spandex or elastane for comfort and flexibility while on the road. It will resist wear longer, dry faster, and feel much more comfortable. While not on this year’s list, Aviator’s The Best Travel Jeans in the World are very comfortable and weave in some stretch, but they weigh nearly twice as much as every other pant on the list. Our cotton choices keep the weight down.

Most of the pants on this list are woven from synthetic fibers. Synthetics tend to stand up to more abuse than their natural counterparts. For example, Ornot’s Mission Pant is incredibly durable and is built for men who abuse pants while in the saddle. This is because Ornot weaves the pants from mostly Nylon.

When you think of nylon in outdoor application, you might think of ropes or mountaineering shells — gear that stands up to abuse. It is no surprise that Arc’teryx’s Gamma is constructed from a nylon fabric. Nylon is more durable than polyester but typically doesn’t wick as well.

The downside of poly is that the fibers are porous and can trap bacterial waste, which eventually can cause our workout shirts to stink. This seems to be less of an issue in pants, but if you are looking for durability, we still recommend a nylon material.

Unique to our lists, Proof’s 72-Hour Travel Pant uses a merino wool synthetic blend. Wool is known for its odor-resistant and insulative qualities. Contrary to what you might think, they stay surprisingly cool and breathe well in hot climates. For durability and stretch, Proof weaves nylon, polyester, and a touch of elastane. We wore these pants on a 12-hour flight to Japan, and they were notably cooler.

Weaving in spandex or elastic adds mobility, but can also give the pants a polished, slick finish. KÜHL weaves in a whopping 15% spandex into the material, but most pants will have 2-6% for a combination of durability and mobility. Bluffworks, Unionbay, and Jetty feel more formal with their smooth-faced fabric finishes. Material finishes are more of a personal preference and don’t affect their water resistance, which is added with a DWR wash.

Our favorite pants come from Bluffworks. While the fit is fantastic, they don’t have a DWR. This makes them less desirable if you are traveling to places that rain a lot. However, they excel in so many other ways that they still stand out as our top choice. We noticed the same with our Jack Archer Jetsetter Techs. Water spills off without a DWR.

On the flip side, Western Rise’s DWR not only deflects dirt and grime on the road, but liters of beer simply rolled off them at Oktoberfest. We really took one for the team while testing.

Performance fabrics are standing up to heavy use like never before. Shelling out a few more bucks for quality generally gets you into a more durable pant that should hold up to more extensive use. We’ve put in countless hours testing the pants on this list, so you’re starting in the right place.

Stio (left) sews the pants together with an exposed overlock stitch. Proof’s 72-hour merino (middle left) flat-fells the outer leg seams. Jack Archer binds the overlocked seam with fabric, including a reflective strip on the lower leg. Western Rise (right) stitches the inseam in a single plain seam for comfort; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Seam Construction

Seams are often overlooked. Out of sight, out of mind, seams bring two patches of fabric together and are crucial for durability and comfort. But this is where we can differentiate the good from the great, and this is where we get passionately nerdy.

Flat-felled seams are best for joining heavy fabrics together. Think denim. The material doesn’t stretch and the fabric is woven from heavy cotton yarn. You want a solid seam to join the pants together. The fabric is joined, then rolled over itself and double stitched for a clean, bomber fasten.

None of the pants on our list are joined entirely from flat-felled seams, though LIVSN and Proof incorporate a flat-fell seam on at least one leg seam. In general, we find it more important to flat-fell the inseam of the pants (which is what Proof does).

Too much material tacked together with a flat-fell seam can cause rubbing against the legs. And most travel pants are constructed from lighter-weight fabrics, so pants don’t always need this extra durable seam construction. It can cause tension on lighter, more fragile material, and eventually wear out adjacent to the seams

Many pants can get away with a less expensive, and more comfortable overlocked seam. An overlocking stitch, or welt-seam, has a lower profile, leaving the raw edge exposed but sewn down to the pant. Plus they are nearly as durable as the venerable flat-felled stitch, but can feel more comfortable (it’s less bulky).

Some overlocked stitches aren’t tacked down. That is, the seam isn’t sewn down flat with a second row of stitching, leaving the surged seam exposed on the inside. This usually isn’t a big deal.

Our main concern would be that the stitching could get caught on something and start to unravel. But we haven’t ever had this experience and it’s a fine option to use when binding two lightweight materials together. Ornot and Bluffworks use a combination of overlocked and welted overlocked seams and both pants are holding strong after a few seasons of wear.

The simplest seam, or plain seam, joins the two sides together with a simple, single stitch. Often the cut material is finished with a surger that overstitches the end material, reducing the chances of fraying, but the joining seam itself is sewn together with a single stitch, and the exposed edges butterfly on the inside of the pant.

This is often used for lightweight material where want to reduce the bulk as much as possible. We see this used on Western Rise’s Evolution 2. In theory, this is not a highly durable seam construction. And we’ve seen this kind of seam unravel on a few pants we’ve tested. We’ve also been beating our Western Rise’s for years now and have yet to see their plain seam blow out.

The author testing Western Rise’s DWR — or DBR — at Oktoberfest; (photo/Steve Graepel)

Price & Value

They say you shouldn’t skimp on the things you touch the ground with, and while pants aren’t quite there, they aren’t far off either. Long days in the saddle of international travel can have you in a seated position for hours on end, and that’s when investing in a good pair of travel pants can make the difference. But not every flight is a long haul, and every trip is different — so considering just how much to spend on a pair of pants is wise.

Budget

If hostel hopping is more your speed, saving a buck or two on your travel pants can make a lot of sense. You can easily snag two pairs of budget-minded trousers for the price of some of the higher-end options in our review. Expect to pay less than $100 for these pants, and for them to use larger percentages of nylon in their weaves. Pocket layouts are typically fairly simple with five-pocket styles.

The UNIONBAY Rainier Travel Pants ($40) have been our budget go-to for a few years running now, and it’s seemingly not going anywhere. A simple construction otherwise keeps the overhead on these pants low, and while they tend to show stains a bit more than other pants we’ve tested, they’re cheap enough to keep as a backup pair.

The Jack Archer Jetsetter Tech Pant ($89) raids high-end Japanese textile mills for its Rebound fabric, and was easily one of the most fashion-forward slacks in our review that we felt equally at home in on the jetway or while dressing up.

Mid-Tier

On another level, the construction of mid-tier travel pants is likely where you will notice the largest difference. And it’s where we see overlocked seams, added gusset panels in the crotch, and higher percentages of elastane to add mechanical stretch. All of these design details take more time and material to build into these pants. As such, you should expect to pay between $100 and $150 to slide into a pair.

Check out the Bluffworks Envoy Lightweight Travel Pants ($125), which cranks the dial up from budget pants with a total of nine separate pockets (essential during travel) and are constructed with all overlocked seams, as well as a double seam to keep them from rubbing on the skin.

The LIVSN Ecotrek Trail Pants ($129) also lean into the upgraded materials. They use an Oceanflex fabric that is 70% recycled fishing buoys, while stitching the whole affair together with a smartly tailored cut.

Premium

If you’re paying north of $150 for a pair of travel pants, there’s likely a good reason: either you’re the darling of airline travel mile programs or intensely serious about seeing all 195 countries. Either way, pants in this price range should be thought of as investment pieces, as their durability will long outlast lesser options. Or their comfort is far outside the norm.

The Jack Archer Jetsetter Tech Pant ($89) raids high-end Japanese textile mills for its Rebound fabric, and was easily one of the most fashion-forward slacks in our review that we felt equally at home in on the jetway or while dressing up.

The Proof 72-Hour Merino Travel Pant ($170) is now $30 cheaper, but still approaching an eye-wincing price. The high-percentage merino wool content is to thank here and makes these some of the coziest pants we’ve kicked around in.

(Photo/Steve Graepel)

Frequently Asked Questions

We like a pant that doesn’t ride up or bind when seated, and moves with you when active. Public Rec, Arc’teryx, and Jack Archer are very close at the top, for pure comfort, you can’t beat Bluffworks Envoy. Beyond the fantastic material, the pant is is available in slim and regular fit, so there’s truly a comfortable pant for everyone’s preference.

We’ve tested Western Rise’s Evolution lineup standing outside in Bogota monsoon season, climbing snow and ice on the Grand, and prosting over beers at Oktoberfest. The DWR not only sheds spills, but it deflects dirt and grime too.

After a week of wearing them across the Alps, including a day sitting in the stairwell of an overbooked train to Munich, we were shocked at how clean our light khaki Evolution 2.0s walked off the return flight.

Though it does not employ a formal DWR, Jack Archer has a unique helically woven PTT that impressively sheds water with the best.

If you’re bringing one pair of pants, you’ll eventually have to wash them while on the road. A lightweight synthetic pant is your best bet for a comfortable morning. Here again, Western Rise’s Evolutions rose to the top. They are lightweight, durable, and dry out quicker than most. They also remain cool and breezy in hot climates and wear supremely well.

We don’t have a true cargo pant on this years list and are looking to find a functional fashionable pant that meets the demands of travel. For an impressive pocket game, but a more polished look, we recommend looking at Bluffworks Envoy, which stealthily hides nine pockets in the otherwise casual-looking chino.

Stio’s Vallis and KUIU’s Bridger, with six practical and accessible pockets each, are close. LIVSN distributes a variety of pocket in usable configuration. These pants are really the evolution of the cargo pant, elevating functionality with more fashionable style.

(Photo/Steve Graepel)

Ornot’s Mission pants weaves a high Nylon count, and wear fantastic both in style and durability. If you are OK with a jogger, we recommend looking at Arc’teryx’s Gamma. The Fortius fabric is made from a Nylon-elastane blend that they use in their rock climbing softshells. It’s bomber, but wears less street friendly.

For long flights on the plane, we like comfortable, casual look with easy pocket access. With the variation of easy-to-access pocket configuration, we give the nod to LIVSN’s Ecotrek Trail Pant. The device pocket is great in the seat.

For comfort and pocket configuration, we appreciate a jogger and recommend Kühls suppressor jogger.

KÜHL’s Suppressor Joggers have the highest spandex count on the list at 15%. They are super flexible, light, durable, and have a good DWR. For a more formal look, Bluffworks has an equally impressive spandex weave (10%) and is by far the most comfortable pant on our list. 

For a good combination of flexibility, durability, and all-around wearability, we recommend Western Rise’s Evolution 2. If you want to splurge, we also liked Proof’s 72-Hour Merino Travel Pant, which blends 6% elastane into the wool-synthetic base.

Proof’s pants are nearly a one-and-done purchase. We wore ours for 2 weeks in Japan. They are durable and stay stench-free on the road, making them the only pants you may need to bring.

For travel with flexible itineraries, give Teren. Their Traveler is the only pant infused with bug repellant and makes a great option if you are taking side diversions into tick country. If you prefer the same style but want a DWR, give their Daily Driver a look. Using different material, it’s warmer and treated with DWR.

Testing travel pants in Japan; (photo/Steve Graepel)


We tested the best men’s hiking pants from Outdoor Research, REI Co-op, Fjällräven, Black Diamond, and more to help you find the best option for your needs and budget.


Work pants provide functional utility for carpentry, construction, ranch work, or DIY home projects. These are the best work pants we have found in 2024.





Source link

Continue Reading

Budget & Luxury Travel

Perfect Stay Guide: Must-Have Tips for Effortless Travel Style

Discover how the perfect stay guide can help you choose accommodations that match your travel style, whether you’re seeking luxury indulgence or budget-friendly comfort for an unforgettable trip.

Published

on

How to Choose the Perfect Stay for Your Travel Style

Choosing the perfect stay for your travel style can make or break your entire trip experience. Whether you’re planning a relaxing retreat or an adventurous getaway, where you choose to stay sets the tone for your journey. The decision often hinges on several factors, including preferences like luxury vs budget accommodations, whether you’re traveling solo vs group, or if your destination is more urban or rural—city vs countryside. Navigating these choices can be overwhelming, but with the right guidance, you can tailor your accommodation to perfectly align with your travel style. Here’s how to approach this important aspect of travel planning.

Understanding Your Travel Priorities

Before diving into specific options, it’s crucial to identify what kind of travel experience you want. Are you aiming for rest and rejuvenation, cultural immersion, or social interaction? Your answers will reveal a lot about the kind of stay that will best suit you.

Luxury vs Budget: Finding the Right Balance

One of the most common dilemmas travelers face is choosing between luxury vs budget accommodations. Both have distinct advantages depending on your needs and style:

The Appeal of Luxury Stays

Luxury accommodations offer comfort, top-notch amenities, exclusive services, and often prime locations. These stays are perfect if relaxation and indulgence are top priorities. You’ll find five-star hotels, boutique resorts, or lavish villas equipped with spa services, gourmet dining, and concierge assistance. For travelers who value impeccable service and extra pampering—often a solo traveler looking to recharge or couples on romantic retreats—luxury stays can turn an ordinary trip into an extraordinary experience.

Why Budget Stays Are Sometimes Better

Budget options like hostels, guesthouses, or budget hotels appeal to those prioritizing cost savings without compromising on cleanliness and basic comforts. Backpackers, students, and group travelers often prefer budget stays to maximize their travel duration or spend more on experiences rather than lodging. Interestingly, budget accommodations can also foster community and social interaction, especially in dorm-style hostels that encourage mingling among solo travelers.

Bargain Your Way to the Best Hotel Stays

Get exclusive deals by bidding for your perfect stay on cheQin.ai. Save more on your next booking!

Hotel Bargain

Powered by CheQin.ai – The smartest way to book hotels at the best prices.

Striking the Balance

Sometimes, a mid-range option with boutique hotels or higher-end Airbnb units can combine comfort with affordability. Think about how much time you plan to spend in your room versus exploring the destination—this can help you decide how much to invest in your stay.

Solo vs Group: Tailoring Your Stay to Company

Your choice of accommodation should reflect whether you’re traveling solo vs group, as this can significantly influence comfort, privacy, and convenience.

Solo Travel: Emphasis on Security and Connection

Solo travelers often look for safe, comfortable places that also offer opportunities to meet others if desired. Hostels with social areas, small bed-and-breakfasts, or co-living spaces are great for creating connections. On the other hand, solo travelers seeking solitude might prefer boutique hotels or private rentals where they can enjoy peace and quiet. Importantly, solo stays require accommodations that are easy to navigate alone and offer good customer support in case of emergencies.

Group Travel: Focus on Space and Shared Experiences

Groups, whether friends or family, demand ample space and cost-effective options. Vacation rentals or serviced apartments with multiple bedrooms and communal areas work wonderfully for groups. These options often allow you to cook your meals and enjoy quality time together, enhancing the group dynamic. Hotels offering suites or adjoining rooms can also be convenient, providing individual privacy alongside shared space.

City vs Countryside: The Setting Matters

Your destination’s environment—whether city vs countryside—plays a key role in shaping your lodging preferences.

City Stays: Convenience and Connectivity

Urban destinations are typically bustling with activity, so accommodations here often prioritize proximity to transportation, nightlife, museums, and dining hotspots. Hotels or apartments in the city center or near major transit hubs make it easier for you to explore without wasting time commuting. For solo or group travelers alike, the city offers plenty of social opportunities and amenities.

Countryside Stays: Nature and Tranquility

If your aim is to disconnect and recharge, rural stays provide a serene atmosphere surrounded by nature. Farmhouses, cabins, or countryside inns often embody the essence of peace and offer authentic local experiences. These types of accommodations encourage relaxation and allow travelers to engage in outdoor activities like hiking or stargazing. However, keep in mind the potential trade-off in terms of fewer dining and entertainment options nearby.

Additional Tips for Choosing the Perfect Stay

  • Read Reviews Thoroughly: Past guest experiences can offer invaluable insights into what to expect.
  • Consider Amenities: Free Wi-Fi, kitchen facilities, and laundry services can significantly affect comfort.
  • Check Accessibility: Make sure the accommodation suits your mobility needs and proximity to points of interest.
  • Book Early: Especially in popular destinations or during peak seasons, early booking ensures availability and better rates.

Finding the ideal accommodation depends on a clear understanding of your travel style and priorities. Balancing luxury vs budget needs, choosing based on solo vs group dynamics, and factoring in the environment—city vs countryside—will guide you toward the perfect stay. Remember, your lodging isn’t just a place to sleep; it’s part of your travel adventure. Choose wisely, and your stay will enhance your journey, creating memories you’ll cherish forever.

Continue Reading

Ways to Travel

Pursuit of entertainment or self-expression? Research on adventure tourism

Published

on


Data collection

The study focused on domestic and foreign tourists aged 18 and above participating in rafting at Antalya Köprülü Canyon. The questionnaires were applied immediately after rafting in-person, and it was thought that the tourists’ experiences were reflected. In order to accurately measure tourist motivations, the literature was reviewed and scales were selected from the literature. In the process of selecting the scales, previously experienced ready-made scales were used, however, the scales were preferred from ready-made scales with high values in terms of validity and reliability. The aim here is to measure the constructs measured in the study in the most reliable way and in a way that can be distinguished from other constructs. For this purpose, scales with high Cronbach α or composite reliability values and AVE (average variance extracted) values were preferred. Then the convenience sampling method was used as the sampling method because there was no random selection. It is a statistical fact that the convenience sampling method does not represent the whole population because it is not random. However, it is easier to apply than random sampling in terms of reaching individuals with new experiences. In addition, as a result of studies that can be carried out in other countries or regions, although it is not a random sample, new literature becomes more debatable and converges to a scientific reality with the literature obtained with the convenience sampling method together with the developing literature.

Participants voluntarily participated in the survey after the rafting experience. Thus, it can be stated that the participants’ responses to the questionnaire were not influenced by any incentives. This situation causes the participants’ views on the subject to be more sincere. The questionnaires were collected in 2021. From 327 questionnaires, 31 were excluded for incomplete data, leaving 296 for analysis. The demographics included 68.1% Russian, 21.5% EU citizens, 9.5% Turkish, and 1% from other nationalities, reflecting general tourism trends in Turkey as reported by the World Travel and Tourism Council (2021). According to the World Travel and Tourism Council (2021) report, 12% of those who came to Turkey in 2019 were Russian, and 8% were German tourists, while in 2020, this rate was 13% for Russians and 7% for Bulgaria, Germany and Ukraine. In this case, it is predicted that the data and results obtained from the target audience will provide correct inferences. Therefore, bias in the study poses as much risk as bias that can occur in real life.

Although 50% of the participants have visited Antalya before, the rate of those who have visited Köprülü Canyon before is 24.3%. In this case, it can be said that individuals who have visited before have returned home without rafting in Köprülü Canyon. The rate of those who have rafted before is 29.7%. The fact that the rates of those who have visited Köprülü Canyon and those who have rafted are close may indicate that individuals tend to do it again after the first experience. While 62.4% of the participants were female, 37.6% were male. In this case, it can be stated that women are more oriented towards adventure tourism. 12.2% of the participants are high school graduates, 21.3% are associate degree graduates, 57.4% are bachelor’s degree graduates, and 9.1% are master’s and doctorate graduates. The average age of the participants was 33.36, while the median was 33.

Measures

Five-point Likert-type scales assessed all constructs. The scales covered “experiencing nature” (Perić et al., 2019), “escape” (Carvache-Franco et al., 2019), and “joy” (Pestana et al., 2020). The “WOM” influence (Sirakaya-Turk et al., 2015) and “self-image congruence” (Sirgy et al., 1997) were also measured, along with “revisit intention” (Zhang et al., 2018).

Data analysis and results

The data analysis validated the measurement model and evaluated relationships between the constructs.

Measurement model

The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a satisfactory fit, with chi-square/df at 2.81, CFI at 0.92, SRMR at 0.059, and RMSEA at 0.078 (Hu and Bentler, 1999), as detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Confirmatory factor analysis results.

Construct validity was confirmed, with convergent and discriminant validity assessed and meeting established thresholds (Hair et al., 2014) as shown in Table 2.

Table 2 The results of the inter-construct correlations and AVE value.

According to Tables 1 and 2, the AVE values are greater than 0.50 and the correlation between the variables. Therefore, convergent and discriminant validity is provided. After this stage of the analysis, common method bias (CMB) or common method variance (CMV) was examined. According to Podsakoff et al. (2003), CMB analysis refers to the bias that emerges from external factors on the data set and occurs when the majority of the variance is explained by a single factor (Podsakoff et al., 2003; Gaskin and Lim, 2016). To measure whether the majority of the variance was gathered under a single factor, the single factor Harman test was performed, and the explained variance rate was calculated as 43%. Since the single factor Harman test is a weak analysis, CMB was re-examined using the Controlling for the effects of an unmeasured latent methods factor analysis suggested by Podsakoff et al. (2003), and each regression path was calculated as 0.64, and the explained variance rate was found to be 41%. Since CMB does not exceed 50% (Eichhorn, 2014: p. 8), it can be said that CMB does not exist or is insignificant (Büyükdağ and Kitapci, 2021).

Structural model

The structural model’s evaluation produced the following results: chi-square/df value at 2.81, CFI value at 0.92, SRMR value at 0.059, and RMSEA value at 0.078. These indices satisfy the criteria set by Hu and Bentler (1999), indicating a good fit between the theoretical model and the observed data.

Table 3 shows that push factors significantly and positively influence self-image congruence (β = 0.66), WOM (β = 0.55), and revisit intention (β = 0.32). Self-image congruity also significantly enhances WOM (β = 0.35) and revisit intention (β = 0.30), while WOM positively impacts revisit intention (β = 0.28). The model explains 44% of the variance in self-image congruity, 68% in WOM, and 66% in revisit intention (Fig. 2).

Table 3 Result of the SEM.
Fig. 2: Structural model with standardized path coefficients.

This figure shows the tested structural model with standardized regression weights, reflecting direct and indirect effects among variables. This figure illustrates the structural model with standardized path coefficients, examining the relationships between push factors, self-image congruity, revisit intention, and word-of-mouth. The push factors are measured through three dimensions: experience nature, escape, and joy. The arrows represent the hypothesized paths, and the numerical values indicate the standardized regression weights. The model shows that push factors significantly influence self-image congruity, revisit intention, and word-of-mouth, both directly and indirectly.

Multi-group structural equation modeling (SEM) and analysis results

Multi-group structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to compare the regression paths between two variables based on socio-demographic and field-specific characteristics. Various studies have utilized this approach: Yada et al. (2018) to understand teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy, Al-Swidi and Al Yahya (2017) to examine educational intention and work behavior differences by gender, and Babin et al. (2016), Huang and Ge (2019), Murray et al. (2017), and Aka and Buyukdag (2021) to analyze factors such as culture, household characteristics, store design, and marital status. In this study, multi-group SEM was applied to explore the effects of rafting experience (first-time vs. repeated) and gender (female vs. male model).

According to the multi-group SEM related to rafting experience, the model showed good fit indices with a chi-square/df value of 2.19, a CFI of 0.90, an RMSEA of 0.064, a GFI of 0.79, and an AGFI of 0.73. The comparative analysis between unconstrained and constrained models revealed a chi-square difference of 35.06 and a df difference of 25, indicating no significant variation between the effects of rafting experiences (p = 0.087). Consequently, the research model is applicable to both first-time and repeated rafters. The significance of each path’s rafting experience was further analyzed and is detailed in Table 4.

Table 4 Multi-group SEM results.

According to the multi-group structural equation modeling focused on gender, the model demonstrated good fit indices with a chi-square/df value of 2.17, a CFI of 0.90, an RMSEA of 0.063, a GFI of 0.79, and an AGFI of 0.73. This suggests that the multi-group SEM adequately represents the gender-based differences in the data. Comparative analysis between unconstrained and constrained models showed a chi-square difference of 24.83 and a df difference of 25, indicating no significant variance in gender effects (p = 0.472). Therefore, the research model is equally applicable to both female and male categories. Further analysis was conducted to determine if significant differences exist in local paths based on gender, with detailed results presented in Table 4.

Table 4 shows that push factors affect self-congruence differently for first-time versus repeated rafters. Rafting experience moderates how these factors influence self-image congruence, with a more pronounced effect on first-timers. While push factors significantly impact WOM for both groups, the effect is stronger for newcomers, but rafting experience doesn’t moderate this relationship. Similarly, push factors notably influence revisit intention for first-time rafters, but less so for experienced rafters, where experience doesn’t act as a moderator (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: Multi-group comparison by visit frequency and gender.

This figure illustrates differences in structural paths across first-time and repeat visitors, as well as male and female participants, using varying line styles. This figure presents the multi-group analysis results based on visit frequency (first-time vs. repeated) and gender (female vs. male). The structural paths between push factors, self-image congruity, revisit intention, and word-of-mouth are illustrated with different line styles. Solid lines represent first-time visitors, dotted lines indicate repeat visitors, dash-dot lines show female participants, and dashed lines represent male participants. Path coefficients are shown along each arrow. The figure highlights how these variables interact differently across groups, revealing variations in motivational and behavioral responses based on experience and gender.

The influence of self-congruence on WOM is significant for both novice and seasoned rafters, more so for the latter. This suggests that rafters with prior experience, and with higher self-image congruity, are likelier to share their experiences. Self-congruence significantly affects intention to revisit among experienced rafters, but not for newcomers. However, rafting experience does not moderate these relationships in either case.

The impact of WOM on revisit intention was significant for first-time rafters but not for repeat rafters, with rafting experience not moderating this relationship. Table 4 shows variance differences between these groups. For first-timers, the explained variance is 51%, while only 26.9% for repeat rafters. For WOM, the variance is 70.5% for first-time users and 66.5% for repeat rafters. Regarding revisit intention, the variance is 65.3% for novices and slightly higher at 66.1% for experienced rafters.

The model showed no significant gender-based moderating effects, but coefficients highlight important relationship nuances. Both genders experience a positive, significant effect of push factors on self-image congruence, with males showing a higher coefficient. The impact of push factors on WOM is significant for both, yet stronger for males. Females, however, demonstrate a greater influence of push factors on revisit intention. The effects of self-congruence on WOM are similar across genders. Males exhibit a more substantial influence of self-image congruence on revisit intention. WOM’s impact on revisit intention is marginally higher in males. While gender doesn’t significantly moderate these paths, the data suggest males typically have higher values in consumer experiences involving adventure and risk-taking.

Self-congruence significantly influences WOM for both first-time and repeat rafters, more so for the latter. This suggests experienced rafters, likely with higher self-image congruity, are more prone to sharing their experiences. Self-congruence also impacts revisit intention significantly among experienced rafters, but less for novices. In both cases, rafting experience does not moderate these relationships.

The study shows gender differences in variance rates for self-image congruity, WOM, and revisit intention. Self-image congruity explains 49.3% of the variance in males and 38% in females. For WOM, the variance is 81.6% in males and 57.7% in females. Regarding revisit intention, males have a variance rate of 68.1% compared to 65.7% in females. These results imply that self-image congruence is more prominent in male first-time rafters, who also tend to discuss their adventurous experiences more, indicating higher communication about risk-taking and adventure among males.

Study 2

A multiple correspondence analysis examined relationships between push factors, self-image congruence, and demographics in adventure tourism for greater insight into consumer behavior dynamics.

Multiple correspondence analysis

Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) is a robust multivariate technique used to examine relationships among nominal data. This method allows researchers to analyze data, interpret findings, and develop perceptual maps, facilitating a deeper understanding of the data structure (Hair et al., 2010; Hair et al., 2014). In this study, MCA was employed to analyze the relationships between individuals’ perceptions of push factors, self-image congruence, WOM, and revisit intentions, alongside demographic or social factors such as gender, nationality, rafting experience, and visiting status. The objective was to conduct in-depth research and derive meaningful inferences. The graphical representation from the Multiple Correspondence Analysis is provided in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4: Joint plot of category points from correspondence analysis.

This plot visualizes the associations between categorical variables, such as nationality, gender, experience, loyalty, and satisfaction. Spatial proximity indicates stronger relationships. This joint plot of category points illustrates the relationships among categorical variables based on their positions along two dimensions extracted through correspondence analysis. The plot visualizes associations between destination-related experiences (e.g., visit status, experiential satisfaction, loyalty), demographic variables (e.g., nationality, gender), and motivational/behavioral outcomes (e.g., push/pull factors, revisit intention, WOM). For example, high revisit intention, high congruity, and high WOM cluster on the right side of Dimension 1, while variables like low satisfaction and low loyalty appear on the left. The spatial proximity between categories indicates stronger associations.

According to the multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) results, repeat visitors to Köprülü Canyon are predominantly Turkish, male, and have prior visits to Antalya and rafting experience. These individuals are notably influenced by push and pull factors and demonstrate high self-image congruity, WOM, loyalty, and satisfaction, indicating a strong intention to revisit. Conversely, first-time visitors to Antalya and Köprülü Canyon are primarily Russian and female tourists, characterized by their pursuit of excitement, unique experiences, and experiential pleasure in adventure and risk-taking activities. Despite showing a high intention to revisit, the likelihood of Russian and female tourists returning is relatively low. This pattern suggests that while tourists enjoy adventure tourism as part of their sea, sun, and sand vacation, it is not the primary purpose of their visit. The findings imply that although tourists have significant rafting experiences and entertainment, they are more inclined to explore different geographical regions rather than revisit the same location. Consequently, it is expected that these tourists will likely choose alternative destinations for their next vacation.

Therefore, emphasizing promotions targeting first-time visitors in rafting or adventure tourism is anticipated to yield significant benefits. Consequently, catering to the preferences of Russian and female tourists with diverse adventure and risk-taking tourism options is projected to create a vital market segment. However, the analysis indicates that European tourists exhibit lower levels of self-image congruity, WOM, revisit intention, and satisfaction with push and pull factors related to rafting. As such, understanding the specific expectations of tourists from the European Union and offering varied tourism alternatives could become a significant source of revenue. Addressing these preferences may lead to enhanced tourist experiences and increased revisit rates.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ways to Travel

Departure Lounge: Take a small-ship trip to Antarctica – Irish Examiner

Published

on



Departure Lounge: Take a small-ship trip to Antarctica  Irish Examiner



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 AISTORIZ. For enquiries email at prompt@travelstoriz.com